asdf1
- 734
- 0
What does it mean by momentum transfer is not a vector (3 components) but rather a tensor (9 components)?
The discussion revolves around the concept of momentum transfer in the context of Newton's law of viscosity, specifically addressing the idea that momentum transfer is represented as a tensor rather than a vector. The scope includes theoretical aspects of fluid dynamics and tensor analysis.
Participants express curiosity and share insights about the topic, but there is no clear consensus on the implications or interpretations of momentum transfer as a tensor versus a vector.
The discussion does not resolve the complexities of tensor analysis or the specific implications of representing momentum transfer as a tensor. There are references to foundational knowledge in mathematics and physics that may be assumed but are not explicitly detailed.
This discussion may be of interest to students and professionals in physics, engineering, and applied mathematics, particularly those exploring fluid dynamics and tensor analysis.
asdf1 said:What does it mean by momentum transfer is not a vector (3 components) but rather a tensor (9 components)?
Tensor analysis is the type of subject that can make even the best of students shudder. My own post-graduate instructor in the subject took away much of the fear by speaking of an implicit rhythm in the peculiar notation traditionally used, and helped us to see how this rhythm plays its way throughout the various formalisms. Prior to taking that class, I had spent many years “playing” on my own with tensors. I found the going to be tremendously difficult but was able, over time, to back out some physical and geometrical considerations that helped to make the subject a little more transparent. Today, it is sometimes hard not to think in terms of tensors and their associated concepts. This article, prompted and greatly enhanced by Marlos Jacob, whom I’ve met only by e-mail, is an attempt to record those early notions concerning tensors. It is intended to serve as a bridge from the point where most undergraduate students “leave off” in their studies of mathematics to the place where most texts on tensor analysis begin. A basic knowledge of vectors, matrices, and physics is assumed. A semi-intuitive approach to those notions underlying tensor analysis is given via scalars, vectors, dyads, triads, and higher vector products. The reader must be prepared to do some mathematics and to think. For those students who wish to go beyond this humble start, I can only recommend my professor’s wisdom: find the rhythm in the mathematics and you will fare pretty well.