Understanding nullspace (kernel) of a matrix

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the kernel (nullspace) of a specific matrix through row reduction. The kernel is determined to be a subspace of a linear transformation, indicating that the matrix condenses R4 down to a two-dimensional plane in R3, losing two dimensions in the process. The practical implications of the kernel are highlighted, showing how it measures the loss of information during linear transformations. Examples illustrate how different transformations affect the nullspace, emphasizing its importance in understanding linear mappings and solving systems of linear equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically nullspace and kernel.
  • Proficiency in row reduction techniques for matrices.
  • Familiarity with linear transformations and their geometric interpretations.
  • Knowledge of vector spaces and dimensions in Rn.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations and their effects on vector spaces.
  • Learn about the Rank-Nullity Theorem and its applications in linear algebra.
  • Explore practical applications of nullspace in solving real-world problems.
  • Investigate advanced topics such as eigenvalues and eigenvectors in relation to linear transformations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as engineers and data scientists who utilize linear transformations in their work.

NewtonianAlch
Messages
453
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the kernel of the matrix:

[PLAIN]http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9015/53369959.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



So I row-reduce it and get:

[PLAIN]http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/1391/97980793.jpg

The system of equations the row-reduced form equals 0.

So I set x[itex]_{3}[/itex] and x[itex]_{4}[/itex] as the free variables and solve for x[itex]_{2}[/itex]: x[itex]_{2}[/itex] = -x[itex]_{3}[/itex] - x[itex]_{4}[/itex]

Substitute that into the top equation to get x[itex]_{1}[/itex] -4(x[itex]_{3}[/itex]+x[itex]_{4}[/itex]) +2x[itex]_{3}[/itex] +7x[itex]_{4}[/itex] = 0

Solve for x[itex]_{1}[/itex]: x[itex]_{1}[/itex] = 2x[itex]_{3}[/itex] - 3x[itex]_{4}[/itex]

From this we get:

Vector(2x[itex]_{3}[/itex]-3x[itex]_{4}[/itex], -x[itex]_{3}[/itex]-x[itex]_{4}[/itex], x[itex]_{3}[/itex], x[itex]_{4}[/itex])

So ker(A) = x = x[itex]_{3}[/itex](2,-1,1,0) + x[itex]_{4}[/itex](-3,-1,0,1)

What does this mean essentially? I know how to solve it, but I don't really understand what I'm doing or what this is useful for. As far as I understand, the kernel is a subspace of a linear map, so what does this translate to in practical terms?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
well a linear transformation maps one vector space into another. the kernel is a measure of how many vectors get annihilated by the linear transformation (we lose entire dimensions at a time).

in this case, we lose 2 dimensions, meaning there is only 2 left for the image space. the matrix A condenses R^4 down to a two dimensional plane in R^3, by sending an entire 2-dimensional plane to the origin.

it's easier to understand what this means with some really basic examples (we will assume the standard bases are used):

suppose T:R^3-->R^2 is the map T(x,y,z) = (x,y). we just dump the 3rd dimension. this has the matrix:

[1 0 0]
[0 1 0], and it's pretty clear that the nullspace of T is {(0,0,z) : z in R} (the z-axis).

or suppose L:R^3-->R^3 is the map L(x,y,z) = (x,x,x). this has the matrix

[1 0 0]
[1 0 0]
[1 0 0], and has nullspace {(0,y,z) : y,z in R}. here our image space is just the line x(1,1,1), anything in the yz-plane maps to the origin.

the nullspace tells you how much information you are losing because of a linear transformation T. if a nullspace is just {0}, you know that T is preserving a faithful copy of the original space (although it may "stretch" or "rotate" vectors, we can still trade coordinates one-for-one). a matrix for such a T just sends a basis straight over to some other basis.

in terms of solving systems of linear equations, finding x for which Ax = 0, and finding nullspace(A), are the same problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K