Understanding nullspace (kernel) of a matrix

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 2K views
NewtonianAlch
Messages
453
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the kernel of the matrix:

[PLAIN]http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9015/53369959.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



So I row-reduce it and get:

[PLAIN]http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/1391/97980793.jpg

The system of equations the row-reduced form equals 0.

So I set x[itex]_{3}[/itex] and x[itex]_{4}[/itex] as the free variables and solve for x[itex]_{2}[/itex]: x[itex]_{2}[/itex] = -x[itex]_{3}[/itex] - x[itex]_{4}[/itex]

Substitute that into the top equation to get x[itex]_{1}[/itex] -4(x[itex]_{3}[/itex]+x[itex]_{4}[/itex]) +2x[itex]_{3}[/itex] +7x[itex]_{4}[/itex] = 0

Solve for x[itex]_{1}[/itex]: x[itex]_{1}[/itex] = 2x[itex]_{3}[/itex] - 3x[itex]_{4}[/itex]

From this we get:

Vector(2x[itex]_{3}[/itex]-3x[itex]_{4}[/itex], -x[itex]_{3}[/itex]-x[itex]_{4}[/itex], x[itex]_{3}[/itex], x[itex]_{4}[/itex])

So ker(A) = x = x[itex]_{3}[/itex](2,-1,1,0) + x[itex]_{4}[/itex](-3,-1,0,1)

What does this mean essentially? I know how to solve it, but I don't really understand what I'm doing or what this is useful for. As far as I understand, the kernel is a subspace of a linear map, so what does this translate to in practical terms?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
on Phys.org
well a linear transformation maps one vector space into another. the kernel is a measure of how many vectors get annihilated by the linear transformation (we lose entire dimensions at a time).

in this case, we lose 2 dimensions, meaning there is only 2 left for the image space. the matrix A condenses R^4 down to a two dimensional plane in R^3, by sending an entire 2-dimensional plane to the origin.

it's easier to understand what this means with some really basic examples (we will assume the standard bases are used):

suppose T:R^3-->R^2 is the map T(x,y,z) = (x,y). we just dump the 3rd dimension. this has the matrix:

[1 0 0]
[0 1 0], and it's pretty clear that the nullspace of T is {(0,0,z) : z in R} (the z-axis).

or suppose L:R^3-->R^3 is the map L(x,y,z) = (x,x,x). this has the matrix

[1 0 0]
[1 0 0]
[1 0 0], and has nullspace {(0,y,z) : y,z in R}. here our image space is just the line x(1,1,1), anything in the yz-plane maps to the origin.

the nullspace tells you how much information you are losing because of a linear transformation T. if a nullspace is just {0}, you know that T is preserving a faithful copy of the original space (although it may "stretch" or "rotate" vectors, we can still trade coordinates one-for-one). a matrix for such a T just sends a basis straight over to some other basis.

in terms of solving systems of linear equations, finding x for which Ax = 0, and finding nullspace(A), are the same problem.