Understanding Poles & Filters: Counting Capacitors & dB/decade

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physixs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filters Poles
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the misconceptions surrounding poles and filters in electronic circuits, specifically addressing the relationship between bypass capacitors and pole count. It establishes that counting capacitors does not reliably indicate the number of poles in a filter, as some capacitors may create zeros instead. The conversation emphasizes that while two poles typically result in a roll-off of -40 dB/decade, this is contingent on the absence of zeros in the circuit. The distinction between bypass capacitors and signal path capacitors is also highlighted, underscoring the complexity of accurately determining pole count.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electronic circuit components, specifically capacitors
  • Familiarity with filter design concepts, including poles and zeros
  • Basic knowledge of frequency response and dB/decade roll-off
  • Experience with circuit analysis techniques, particularly time constants
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of poles and zeros in filter design
  • Learn about the role of bypass capacitors versus signal path capacitors
  • Explore advanced circuit analysis techniques, including time constant calculations
  • Investigate the impact of zeros on frequency response and roll-off rates
USEFUL FOR

Electronics engineers, circuit designers, and students studying filter design and frequency response analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Physixs
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was reading over poles and filters, but I guess since I don't learn calculus, I don't learn transforms.

With that said, the definition of Poles in my text is a bit iffy... It talks about how the term poles means how many bypass capacitors are in a circuit.

I can't find ANY definitions even remotely close to that online.

However, if I google image filters, I can physically count capacitors to find out how many poles the filter is.

Can I always do that? Can I always look at a circuit, count the capacitors and know how many poles there are in that circuit? Is that legit?

For instance in the picture I provided, since I can see six bypass capacitors, does that mean it is a six-pole filter (I know the answer but wasnt sure if the method was ok)

Also, do you just ignore the low pass filter capacitor that is in the op amp itself (because it is not a bypass capacitor)?

Also, would it be safe to say that as a rule of thumb if you have 2 poles, your roll off will be double (-40dB/decade) and if you have 3 poles it will be triple (-60 dB/decade)?

Thanks so much
 

Attachments

  • F_3_9.gif
    F_3_9.gif
    11 KB · Views: 696
Engineering news on Phys.org
No you can't just "count capacitors" to determine how many poles there are. You can count "time constants" but that is a more advanced technique. Also what you show in the figure are not "bypass capacitors" they are in the signal path. A bypass capacitor is a capacitor connected between power and ground that shunts high-frequency noise from the supply to the ground (ideally the power supply is a small-signal ground so you want power and ground to be shorted at all frequencies above DC).

The main problem in "counting capacitors" is that sometimes a capacitor doesn't make a pole (which make the filter more low-pass) but sometimes it makes a zero (which makes a filter more high-pass).

In your circuit it is a coincidence that there are six capacitors. (as you said there are additional caps in the op amps for stability). In some very basic circuits (such as a series of RC stages) you can count capacitors but not always.

Lastly it is only "safe to say" that two poles --> -40dB/decade and so on if you don't have any zeros in your circuit. You can say if you have two more poles than zeros in your circuit there will be some point where the magnitude response is rolling off at -40dB/decade but where that region is depends on the locations of your poles and zeros.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
40K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K