Understanding Prime Power Proofs

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding a proof related to the inequality involving prime numbers, specifically that the nth prime number, pn, is less than or equal to 22n-1. The proof utilizes mathematical induction, starting with the base case for n=1 and assuming the inequality holds for all integers up to n. The confusion arises regarding the use of p1, p2, etc., and their relation to powers of two, clarifying that these primes are not replaced by powers but are part of a product that is bounded by a function involving powers of two. The argument concludes that the induction step is completed by showing pn+1 also adheres to the established inequality. Overall, the proof aims to establish a relationship between prime numbers and their growth rate in relation to powers of two.
mlsbbe
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am having trouble understanding this proof.


Statement

If pn is the nth prime number, then pn \leq 22n-1


Proof:


Let us proceed by induction on n, the asserted inequality being clearly true when n=1. As the hypothesis of the induction, we assume n>1 and the result holds for all integers up to n.

Then

pn+1 \leq p1p2...pn + 1

pn+1 \leq 2.22...22n-1 + 1 = 21 + 2 + 22+ ...+ 2n-1

Recalling the indentity 1 + 2 +22+ ...+2n-1=2n-1

Hence

pn+1 \leq 22n-1+1

But 1 \leq 22n-1 for all n; whence

pn+1 \leq22n-1+22n-1
=2.22n-1
=22n
completing the induction step, and the argument.



What I don't understand is why the proof uses p1, p2, etc as powers of two. What is the nature of the pn? Are they prime or what? Why use powers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the proof , it is not that p1 , p2 , p3 have been replaced by powers of 2 . All that it is saying is that :

p1.p2.p3.p4...pn < 2 . (2^2) . (2^4) ... ( 2 ^ (2^n - 1 ) ).

This is because it is assuming the theorem to be true for p1 , p2 .. upto pn .
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K