Understanding Proton Decay: College Physics Help

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter waterliyl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Protons
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Proton decay remains a theoretical concept in quantum physics, with the Standard Model predicting that protons are stable due to baryon number conservation. However, certain Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) suggest that protons may decay over extremely long timescales, with experimental limits indicating a lifetime of at least 1032 years. The decay process, known as beta+ decay, involves a proton transforming into a neutron, positron, and neutrino via the weak interaction. Despite theoretical predictions, free proton decay has not been observed, and current understanding attributes proton stability to the suppression of decay channels, particularly involving sphalerons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum physics principles
  • Familiarity with the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Knowledge of weak interactions and beta decay
  • Basic concepts of Grand Unified Theories (GUTs)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) on proton decay
  • Study the weak interaction and its role in beta+ decay
  • Explore the concept of sphalerons and their effects on baryon number conservation
  • Investigate experimental searches for proton decay and their methodologies
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focused on quantum mechanics, particle physics, and theoretical physics, will benefit from this discussion on proton decay and related concepts.

  • #31
It is an old textbook in russian: Particle physics and Symmetries - Svörtynsky

The problem says:

Of all the fermion bilinears (scalar, pseudoscalar, vector, axialvector and tensor), which of them cancel for a Majorana fermion such that ##\psi = \psi^c##? Does a kinetic term of the form ## \bar{\psi}\gamma_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}\psi^c ## cancel?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
@Breo: open a new thread for a new question please.
 
  • #33
I still do not understand one thing. Probably is a small misconception.

If protons are generally considered to be stable because the baryon number symmetry protects them, but it is broken in the Standard Model at the quantum level (chiral anomaly, but still SM), why we still say that protons are stable in SM? (forget about GUTs)
 
  • #34
In last week's seminar, a professor said that the chiral anomaly will lead to a lifetime of $10^{70}$ years.

From this I conclude the following: The SU(5) GUT have lifetimes of sometimes less than $10^{35}$ years. Therefore the difference is so large, that one can consider the protons stable even with the chiral anomaly in the standard model.
 
  • #35
zombie post...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
906
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
998
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K