Understanding Reciprocal Space in Solid State Physics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WarPhalange
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reciprocal Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of reciprocal space in solid state physics, particularly its relationship to lattice structures and wavefunctions. Participants explore various interpretations and mathematical definitions of reciprocal space, its geometric properties, and its implications for understanding momentum and wave behavior in periodic potentials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the relationship between lattice spacing (X) and wavelength, questioning why X would be considered a wavelength in the context of reciprocal space.
  • Another participant explains that reciprocal space can be viewed geometrically, defined by the relationship between direct lattice vectors and reciprocal lattice vectors, emphasizing the mathematical definition involving the Kronecker delta.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that X is simply the unit spacing in direct space, and that 2*pi/X represents the unit spacing in momentum space, which is relevant for determining optoelectronic properties.
  • Another participant elaborates on the relationship between reciprocal space vectors and lattice planes, stating that the shortest reciprocal space vector corresponds to the spacing between lattice planes and connects this to the behavior of plane waves interacting with these planes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of X as a wavelength. There are competing views on the nature of reciprocal space and its definitions, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of terms and the mathematical relationships involved are not fully explored, leading to potential gaps in understanding. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with the concepts of reciprocal space and its applications.

WarPhalange
I am taking Solid State now and using Kittel as the textbook. Needless to say, I don't understand almost anything that's happening.

I'm still stuck on Reciprocal Space here. If I have a lattice of atoms of spacing X, then in reciprocal space I get something like 2*pi/X spacing. My prof. explained that as being the momentum space since Reciprocal Space is basically a Fourier transform of the lattice.

That only makes sense if X is a wavelength and therefore 2*pi/X * h-bar = momentum.

But I don't understand why X would be a wavelength. I guess it would be the maximum wavelength between atoms? And then 2*pi/X * h-bar is the minimum momentum that can get transferred?

I am really clueless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are different ways to think about reciprocal space. For one, you can think of it as a purely geometrical thing. If you have a lattice with vectors \mathbf{a}_i, then the reciprocal lattice is defined by

\mathbf{a}_i \cdot \mathbf{g}_j = 2\pi\delta_{ij}.

It's a purely geometrical thing, and the above equation defines a lattice with vectors \mathbf{g}_i. In mathematics this would probably be called a dual lattice, but in physics we call it a reciprocal lattice because of the units (g has units of 1 / length).

Another way reciprocal space shows up is if you look at the solution to the Schroedinger equation for a periodic potential, Bloch's theorem says that the wavefunctions are a product of two periodic functions, and of the form

\psi_{kn}(r) = u_{kn}(r) e^{i k \cdot r}

where k is the so-called pseudomomentum vector, which serves as a quantum number. k is restricted to the first Brillouin zone, where k = l_1 g_1 + l_2 g_2 + l_3 g_3 where the l's are restricted to the range [-0.5,0.5]. So k is restricted to wavelengths which are longer than a lattice vector. The other function u_{kn}(r) is periodic within the unit cell, so if you expand it in planewaves, all the planewaves would be like n_1 g_1 + n_2 g_2 + n_3 g_3 where the n's are integers, thus these wavelengths are all the lattice constants divided by integers.
 
X need not be a wavelength. X is the unit spacing in direct space and 2*pi/X is the unit spacing in inverse (momentum) space. The moentum space will be useful to you in determining certain optoelectronic properties.
 
Hi,
I am trying to explain your confusion, i believe i am right but if not i hope to be corrected by someone who follows this message. The reciprocal space vectors are very good way to define lattice planes in real space. For a group of lattice planes which are parallel to each other in real space, there are corresponding reciprocal space vectors which are perpendicular to the lattice planes, the shortest of one has length 2*pi/d, where d is the spacing between lattice planes. This comes from the fact that exp(iK*r) should be constant on the lattice planes and should be equal to 1 if r describes Bravis lattice vectors. Now just imagine a incident plane wave 'exp(ik*r)'on set of parallel planes. The only way exp(ikr) can have same value on all the planes is when they are separated by wavelength.
I hope it makes sense :)

manoj
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
31K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K