Understanding Reflective Radiation Pressure

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on understanding reflective radiation pressure, specifically the momentum transfer from photons to a reflecting surface. The key equation discussed is Preflec = 2Ef/c * cos²(a), which accounts for both the angle of incidence and the reflection of photons. Participants clarify that the cos² factor arises from the need to consider both the perpendicular component of momentum and the effective area of the reflector as the angle changes. The conversation emphasizes the importance of integrating over solid angles to accurately capture all reflection scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of photon momentum, defined as p = E/c.
  • Familiarity with the concept of radiation pressure and its mathematical representation.
  • Knowledge of solid angle integration in physics.
  • Basic principles of reflection and incidence angles in optics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of radiation pressure equations in classical mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of varying angles of incidence on reflective surfaces.
  • Learn about the differences between perfect and matte reflectors in radiation pressure calculations.
  • Investigate the role of solid angle in photon interactions with surfaces.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optics researchers, and students studying electromagnetic theory or radiation pressure phenomena will benefit from this discussion.

rodriguez1gv
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am just trying to understand the basis of radiation pressure. I understand radiation pressure due to absorption, but I am having a hard time understanding the radiation pressure due to reflection.

From what I understand there will be an incoming photon with momentum p = E/c. The normal momentum will be imparted into the reflecting surface upon impact, resulting in a transfer of energy of Ef/c * cos(a) for incident angle a.

Now the photon will also be reflected in a random direction. I think that there should be an integral over the solid angle to capture all possible reflection angles, but I am not sure what to do exactly. I know Wiki says Preflec=2Ef/c * cos2a for an incident angle a. I am not sure where the cos squared comes from.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello rodriguez1gv and welcome to PF!

rodriguez1gv said:
From what I understand there will be an incoming photon with momentum p = E/c. The normal momentum will be imparted into the reflecting surface upon impact, resulting in a transfer of energy of Ef/c * cos(a) for incident angle a.


Now the photon will also be reflected in a random direction. I think that there should be an integral over the solid angle to capture all possible reflection angles, but I am not sure what to do exactly. I know Wiki says Preflec=2Ef/c * cos2a for an incident angle a.

The wiki article assumes that the angle of reflection is the same as the angle of incidence rather than random reflection direction.

I am not sure where the cos squared comes from.

Note this statement from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure#Radiation_pressure_by_particle_model:_photons :

"The orientation of a reflector determines the component of momentum normal to its surface, and also affects the frontal area of the surface facing the energy source..."

The article is considering a beam of light in which the cross sectional area of the beam is larger than the area of the reflecting surface (like holding a mirror in sunlight.) Think about what happens as you alter the angle of tilt of the reflecting surface in the beam. Will the same number of photons strike the surface per unit time?
 
hi rodriguez1gv! welcome to pf! :smile:
rodriguez1gv said:
. I am not sure where the cos squared comes from.

imagine that you have a 1 sq cm tube of light falling on the reflector

if it falls perpendicuarly, it it spread over 1 sq cm of the reflector

but if it falls at an angle θ, it falls on 1/cosθ sq cm, so it is more spread out, and is diluted by a factor cosθ

furthermore, only the component of momentum perpendicular to the reflector is reversed, so that's another factor of cosθ :wink:

(wikipedia talks about a perfect reflector, so the calculation will be slightly different if the surface is matt)
 
So, to reiterate, the cos squared is accounting for the perpendicular energy and a reduced incident flux due to the tilt of a surface? That makes sense I think, Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K