Understanding Relativity: Explaining Inertial Mass and the Speed of Light

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gwenne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain Melting
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between inertial mass and the speed of light as explained by Einstein's special theory of relativity. It highlights that as a particle approaches the speed of light (c), its inertial mass increases, which prevents it from reaching c. The equation m = (gamma)*m0 is crucial, where m0 is the rest mass and gamma is the Lorentz factor. The participant struggles with applying the concepts of force (F=ma) and momentum (p=mv) in the context of relativity, particularly in differentiating the variables involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, particularly inertial mass and the Lorentz factor (gamma).
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically differentiation and the product rule.
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics equations, including F=ma and p=mv.
  • Basic grasp of Einstein's mass-energy equivalence principle (E=mc^2).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz factor (gamma) and its implications in special relativity.
  • Learn how to apply calculus to physics problems, focusing on differentiation of products.
  • Explore the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in relativistic contexts.
  • Investigate the experimental verification of relativistic mass and its effects on particle physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying calculus-based physics and special relativity, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of inertial mass and relativistic effects.

Gwenne
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi physics geniuses!

I've been awake all night (grr!) trying to figure out some stuff we talked about in our calculus-based physics class today about Relativity. I hope you guys can make this all clear to me, because maybe then I can get some sleep!

OK, so our professor told us this week that as a particle gets closer to c, its inertial mass increases and this is why if you keep pushing on something with the same force, it doesn't accelerate as much and so nothing can ever go at the speed of light. I can't read my own notes, but our textbook says: "Einstein deduced from his special theory of relativity that the tangible, measurable mass of a particle is given by the equation m = (gamma)*m0, where m0 is the mass of the particle at rest relative to the observer, called the rest mass, and m is the mass of the particle in motion, called the inertial or relativistic mass. This mass can be measured, for instance, by applying a known centripetal force and measuring the radius of the curvature of the path, or in other words using F=mv^2/r. " Then it talks about E=mc^2 and p=mv, with the m supposed to be the new m.

OK, I sort of think I get that, but I can't get it to work out right. F=mv^2/r is just F=ma from last semester, which I totally understand, I think. F=ma is supposed to come from F=dp/dt, and p=mv and in Relativity m is supposed to be gamma*m0, but when I try to do it that way, I can't get d/dt(gamma*m0*v) to work out to F=ma, or F=gamma*m0*a, or anything like that, and I've been trying all night to understand this, because if m is "inertial mass" then isn;'t it supposed to be the m in F=ma? What am I doing wrong? I'm sure that the problem is that gamma is complicated and I'm not very good at calculus and I can't do math which is why I am getting a C in this course. But I really want to understand this. Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f = d/dt(mv) is the derivative of a product...both m and v are variables.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K