Understanding Riemann Zeta functions for s=1/3

  • Thread starter Thread starter joao_pimentel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Riemann
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the Riemann Zeta function for s=1/3, noting that the traditional series definition converges only for Re(s) > 1. The user observes that Wolfram Alpha provides a value of approximately -0.9 for ζ(1/3), despite theoretical expectations of divergence. A participant explains that the standard formula does not apply in this case and suggests using an alternative formula involving the Gamma function and an integral. The user is also trying to solve a specific problem related to summing terms involving the cube root, indicating a need for further exploration of the Zeta function's properties. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of evaluating the Zeta function at non-converging values.
joao_pimentel
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Hi guys

I'm trying to understand Riemann Zeta functions particularly for s=1/3

I know \zeta(s)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{n^s}

and converges for Re(s)>1

Ok, but what about for s=1/3, then

\zeta(1/3)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{n^{1/3}}=<br /> \sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{n}}

Theoretically it should not converge, but when I put \zeta(1/3) on Wolfram I get approximately -0,9

May you kindly explain me this result, please?

________________________

Why? Because I'm trying to solve this problem:
\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{4}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{5}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{6}}+...+\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{1000000}}\right]

where \left[x\right] = is the Greatest Integer function

And I thought Riemann Zeta functions might be the solutions...

Any tips?

Thank a lot in advance guys for your support...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wolfram-Alpha gives that result mainly because the Riemann Zeta Function formula you're using, i.e.

\zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^s}

Only applies when Re(n)>1. Since the number you're using doesn't fit that application, we have to use a different formula, usually this one:

\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(s)} \int_0^\infty \frac{x^{s-1}}{e^x - 1} dx

That formula should give you a solution to Zeta(1/3). But I don't think it'll apply in this problem.
 
ok, thank you so very much for your attention...

I'll continue thinking on the subject...

thanks
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K