Understanding Set Theory and the + Symbol: Solving Equations with Sets

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around set theory, specifically the use of the "+" symbol in the context of sets and their Cartesian products. The original poster is trying to understand the expression X × (Y + Z) and its equivalence to X × Y + X × Z, particularly focusing on the notation and meaning of the ordered pairs involved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of the "+" symbol in set theory, questioning its meaning and the implications of the notation used in the problem. There is a focus on understanding the representation of elements in ordered pairs and the significance of the numbers 0 and 1 in that context.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the definition of the "+" symbol as a disjoint union and have discussed its implications for the problem at hand. There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and the relationships between the sets involved, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that additional information about the sets X, Y, and Z may be necessary to fully understand the problem. There is also mention of potential typos in the original problem statement that could affect interpretation.

mikemhz
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Set Theory "+" symbol

1. X, Y and Z are sets. Does X × (Y + Z) = X × Y + X × Z?

The solution starts like so:

X × (Y + Z) = {(x,(y,0)) | x [itex]\in[/itex] X, y [itex]\in[/itex] Y}[itex]\cup[/itex]{(x,(z,1)) | x [itex]\in[/itex] X, z [itex]\in[/itex] Z}

I don't understand how the "+" symbol works. Why does it equate to this (x,(y,0)) (x,(z,1)) format? 0... 1...?

This is a frustrating early stumbling point for my discrete mathematics, "foundations of computer science" exam revision. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think more people would be able to help if you define +, 0 and 1, and explain if you're talking about subsets of ℝ or something else.
 


mikemhz said:
1. X, Y and Z are sets. Does X × (Y + Z) = X × Y + X × Z?

The solution starts like so:

X × (Y + Z) = {(x,(y,0)) | x [itex]\in[/itex] X, y [itex]\in[/itex] Y}[itex]\cup[/itex]{(x,(z,1)) | x [itex]\in[/itex] X, z [itex]\in[/itex] Z}

I don't understand how the "+" symbol works. Why does it equate to this (x,(y,0)) (x,(z,1)) format? 0... 1...?

This is a frustrating early stumbling point for my discrete mathematics, "foundations of computer science" exam revision. Please help.
Hello mikemhz. Welcome to PF !

[STRIKE]I suspect there's more to this problem than you have given us.

Please state the complete problem as it was given to you. As Fredrik suggested, there must be more information regarding the sets X, Y, and Z and the opperation, +, than you have stated.[/STRIKE]

Added in Edit:
I see you posted the problem seconds after I posted this.
 
Last edited:


So the full question is phrased like so:

Suppose X; Y and Z are sets. Does X × (Y + Z) = X × Y + X × Z?
If X, Y and Z are finite, what can we say about the cardinalities of
X × (Y + Z) and X × Y + X × Z?


I'm not looking for the solution. It's sitting here in front of me. I just don't understand the very first step. That being:

X×(Y+Z) = {(x,(y,0)) | x [itex]\in[/itex] X, y [itex]\in[/itex] Y}[itex]\cup[/itex]{(x,(z,1)) | x [itex]\in[/itex] X, y [itex]\in[/itex] Y}

X×Y+Y×Z = {((x, y),0) | x [itex]\in[/itex] X, y [itex]\in[/itex] Y}[itex]\cup[/itex]{((x,z),1) | x [itex]\in[/itex] X, z [itex]\in[/itex] Z}


These two are clearly not equal as sets because they have different
elements: for example, given x [itex]\in[/itex] X, y [itex]\in[/itex] Y , by the definition of ordered
pairs it is not the case that (x,(y, 0)) = ((x, y), 0).


I understand why these are not equal, but not where 1 and 0 come into it, or what "+" means, as it's not in the standard set theory symbol set.

EDIT: I also suspect there is a typo on the first line of the solution, surely the second half involves Z rather than Y?
 
Last edited:


So I just looked through the lecture slides and the "+" symbol means the sum or disjoint union.

X+Y = { (x,0) | x∈X} ∪ {(y,1) | y∈Y}

I think this is an important point to clarify because it crops up again later in the module. Still why 0 and 1?

EDIT: OK. In a moment of clarity I've realized that the digit relates to the position of the ordered pair. So in X+Y, x is in the 0 position, and y is in the 1 position.
 


*Deleted*
 
Last edited:


mikemhz said:
So I just looked through the lecture slides and the "+" symbol means the sum or disjoint union.

X+Y = { (x,0) | x∈X} ∪ {(y,1) | y∈Y}

I think this is an important point to clarify because it crops up again later in the module. Still why 0 and 1?
OK, I think I understand the definition. The idea is that the "disjoint union" of X and Y should be the union of two disjoint sets X' and Y' such that X can be bijectively mapped onto X' and Y can be bijectively mapped onto Y'. So we can use any set with two members to define X' and Y'. We denote the two members by 0 and 1, and define
\begin{align}
&X'=\{(x,0)|x\in X\}\\
&Y'=\{(y,1)|y\in Y\}\\
&X+Y=X'\cup Y'
\end{align}Edit: I think you should just start with a statement like "Let ##w\in X\times(Y+Z)##." Then you can use the definitions to figure out something about w. You can also try the assumption ##w\in X\times Y+X\times Z##, and see what that tells you about w.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K