MHB Understanding Sets, Relations, and Functions for Struggling Students

Plonker1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6500

View attachment 6501

View attachment 6502

View attachment 6503

I'm having issues with the first four questions and have uploaded them. My attempts are shown below.

1.
a) True, all elements of E are even
b) False, 0 is not a multiple of 3
c) True, 8 is even and 9 is a multiple of 3
d) No idea
e) False, 6 is an element of E and T
f) No idea

2.
a) You can see my drawing attempt on imgur, sorry for the messiness (ed's note: see below). The parts meant to be coloured in are in black.
b) This claim is false
c) I drew up another graph that I guessed proves it is false. Am I correct?

3&4 I have no idea how to do.

Thank you so much for any help,
A struggling student.
View attachment 6505

View attachment 6504
 

Attachments

  • v1.png
    v1.png
    8.8 KB · Views: 106
  • v2.png
    v2.png
    9.1 KB · Views: 116
  • v3.png
    v3.png
    23.7 KB · Views: 107
  • v4.png
    v4.png
    10.5 KB · Views: 101
  • v5.jpg
    v5.jpg
    66.2 KB · Views: 119
  • v6.jpg
    v6.jpg
    52.3 KB · Views: 109
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I will comment on a couple things, but are you including 0 in your definition of the natural numbers?
Meaning, do you define the natural numbers as
N = {0,1,2,...} or N = {1,2,...}

Some people include 0 and some do not.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
62
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top