Understanding Spring-Coupled Masses: A Quick Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter *best&sweetest*
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of spring-coupled masses, focusing on potential and kinetic energy calculations associated with the system. Participants are exploring the relationships between the variables involved in the energy expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the correct formulation of potential energy in a system of spring-coupled masses, considering different expressions for total potential energy. There is also confusion regarding the kinetic energy expression and its components.

Discussion Status

Some participants have expressed understanding of the concepts discussed, while others are still seeking clarification on specific energy formulations. There is an indication that guidance has been provided, but no consensus has been reached on the correct expressions.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be some confusion regarding the completeness of the original question and the responses, leading to discussions about the clarity and presentation of information in the thread.

*best&sweetest*
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] spring-coupled masses

Thanks, Doc Al... I think I understand it now!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
*best&sweetest* said:
Is it true that the potential energy U is just the sum of 0.5kx_i^2 with i going from zero to 4, or is it that U = 0.5 k x_1^2 + 0.5 k (x_2 - x_1)^2 + 0.5 k (x_3 - x_2)^2 + 0.5 k x_4^2?
What matters is how much each spring is stretched (or compressed). So the total spring potential energy is given by your second expression. (This is explained on the page that you linked.)

I'm equally confused with the kinetic energy...is it just
K = \Sigma (\frac{1}{2} mv_i^2)?
That's it.
 
*best&sweetest* said:
Thanks, Doc Al... I think I understand it now!

There's a first time for everything. That's a tautology almost. But this type of reply, by editing the very first post, is a first for me in the forum. The answer is left hanging with part of the query missing. I can't but help ask why?
 
Shooting star said:
There's a first time for everything. That's a tautology almost. But this type of reply, by editing the very first post, is a first for me in the forum. The answer is left hanging with part of the query missing. I can't but help ask why?

If you are interested in the question, the entire question is quoted in Doc Al's post, and I managed to understand it by myself, so there is no need for other people to waste their time on it...that's why I deleted it.
 
The more elegant way would be to mark the post as SOLVED.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
995