Understanding Stellar Lifespans: Comparing Luminosity & Mass

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the relationship between a star's luminosity, mass, and lifespan. It establishes that a star's lifetime can be approximated using the formula τ ∼ 1010 yrs (M/M)-3, where M represents the star's mass in solar masses. The conversation highlights that more massive stars have significantly shorter lifespans due to their increased luminosity. The mass-luminosity index varies, with lower mass stars having an index around 4.75, while high-mass stars exhibit an index closer to 3, leading to rapid consumption of their nuclear fuel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stellar evolution and lifecycles
  • Familiarity with the concepts of luminosity and mass in astrophysics
  • Knowledge of the mass-luminosity relationship and its implications
  • Basic grasp of nuclear fusion processes in stars
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore stellar evolution simulations using tools like MESA (Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics)
  • Study the derivation of the mass-luminosity relationship in detail
  • Investigate the effects of stellar composition on lifespan and evolution
  • Learn about the different phases of stellar life cycles, particularly for high-mass stars
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysics students, and anyone interested in the dynamics of stellar lifespans and the factors influencing them.

tommyboo
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi, all how would you go about finding out how much longer a star would live compared to another if you knew the one star was x times more luminous and y times more massive?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
For a precise result, you would use a stellar evolution simulation to calculate the result numerically. For an approximate result, you can use an order of magnitude scaling for how long stars live---which is determined primarily by its mass.

\tau \sim 10^{10} \textrm{ yrs} \left( \frac{M}{M_\odot}\right)^{-3}

*The more massive the star, the (much) shorter its lifetime is, because its luminosity increases rapidly.

Depending on the mass range, the exponent can range somewhat (between about 2 and 3), but this is the general scaling. If you're curious about how to derive it, its based on a few simple assumptions---namely, the temperature of the star is determined by equipartition (i.e. its 'virialized'), the luminosity is thermal, and the amount of fuel is linearly related to the mass of the star.
 
Last edited:
I think you inverted M/Msolar, zhermes. The customary formula is
10^10 x 1/M^2.5 where M is in solar masses
re: http://mais-ccd-spectroscopy.com/Stellar%20Evolution%20Lesson.pdf
 
Last edited:
Chronos said:
I think you inverted M/Msolzhermes.

Oh, damn. Thanks Chronos!
 
Chronos said:
I think you inverted M/Msolar, zhermes. The customary formula is
10^10 x 1/M^2.5 where M is in solar masses
re: http://mais-ccd-spectroscopy.com/Stellar%20Evolution%20Lesson.pdf

The mass-luminosity index is more like 4.75 for stars from 0.7-2.0 times the Sun's mass. Very low mass stars are more convective than such Sun-like stars, and so fuse more of their fusion fuel during the Main Sequence. At the other end of the scale the index is more like 3, and high-mass stars live very rapidly indeed - typically just a few million years. Interestingly they ramp up in core temperature and fuse their way through heavier elements with very little change.
 
Stars are having gases like hydrogen and helium as their elemental compositions.They are continiously active in their core region.The life of star is dependent on this activity and quite difficult to measure it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
519
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K