Understanding the .5 in Kinematic Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the role of the factor of .5 in the kinematic equation for motion under constant acceleration. Participants are exploring the implications of this factor in relation to their experimental results and calculations of acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the derivation of the kinematic equation and questioning how the .5 factor relates to their experimental findings. Some are attempting to reconcile their calculated values of acceleration with the expected results from the kinematic equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations of the kinematic equation being explored. Some participants have offered insights regarding the distinction between average and instantaneous velocity, while others are questioning the validity of their methods for calculating acceleration.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the definitions of average speed versus maximum speed, as well as the correct application of the kinematic equation in relation to experimental data. Participants are also reflecting on their assumptions about the variables involved in their calculations.

checker
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Knowing and understanding the kinematic equation's variables x1, x0, v0, t, and a, how has .5 been incorporated into the equation?

I realized this unknown during lab. Now, as I've nearly completed my analysis, I find that the values I've derived for acceleration should be doubled!


Homework Equations


x1 = x0 + (v0 * t) + (.5 * a * t^2)


The Attempt at a Solution


By using dimensional analysis one can determine that each side of the equation yields distance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Constant acceleration

v= \int a dt = at+C

t=0,v=v0


x=\int v dt = \int (v_0 +at) dt = v_o t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 +C_1

t=0,x=x0⇒C1=x0

x=x0+v0t+½at2

how exactly do your values show that the '½' should be '2'?
 
I'm using Δx/Δt/Δt to produce a value for acceleration. When that value is applied to the kinematic equation, it returns value that does not coincide with the experimental result. By removing the .5, the answer is correct.
 
That's because Δx/Δt/Δt is not acceleration. Δx/Δt is not the maximum speed attained in Δt; it's the average speed, which is half the maximum speed (assuming constant acceleration). Acceleration would be 2Δx/Δt/Δt.
 
checker said:
I'm using Δx/Δt/Δt to produce a value for acceleration.
That is incorrect. The acceleration is Δv/Δt.

However, Δv is not the same as Δx/Δt, because: Δv is the change in velocity, while Δx/Δt is the average velocity.

For an easy example, consider the case of a constant (but nonzero) velocity. Clearly Δv and a are both zero. However Δx/Δt is not zero since the object is moving at constant velocity.
 
ideasrule said:
That's because Δx/Δt/Δt is not acceleration. Δx/Δt is not the maximum speed attained in Δt; it's the average speed, which is half the maximum speed (assuming constant acceleration). Acceleration would be 2Δx/Δt/Δt.
If one is starting from rest, yes that is true.
 
I was incorrectly using a vavg for Δv. I've changed my velocity calculations to reflect an instantaneous velocity, and so my calculations for acceleration are correct and my kinematic equation produces a correct result without any modification.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K