Understanding the Absolute Value of a Quantum State

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization of a quantum state in quantum mechanics. The original poster presents a state |φ⟩ as a linear combination of two orthonormal states |+⟩ and |−⟩, and seeks to understand the implications of ensuring that the absolute value of this state is one.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the expression for the norm of the state |φ⟩ and the role of complex coefficients in this context. There is a focus on the scalar product and its implications for normalization. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the original poster's approach and the significance of both real and imaginary parts of the coefficients.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's attempts at a solution. Some guidance has been offered regarding the normalization process, and there is an exploration of different interpretations of the normalization constant. Multiple perspectives on the mathematical expressions involved are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the quantum states involved are orthonormal, which is a crucial assumption in the discussion. There is also mention of language barriers affecting the original poster's terminology.

Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I'm new to quantum mechanics, so bear with me o:)

Homework Statement



I'm not sure if scaling is the right word here, but my problem is about the absolut value of a quantum mechanics state to be one. I have the state [tex]| \phi>[/tex] which is a linear combination of the states [tex]|+>[/tex] and [tex]|->[/tex]. The first task is about scaling my phi.


Homework Equations



.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know [tex]| \phi> = \lambda_1 |+> + \lambda_2 |->[/tex] whereas the lambdas are complex numbers.

Afterwards I used the definition of the scalar product to get the norm.
[tex]<\phi|\phi> = (\lambda_{1}' <+| + \lambda_{2}'<-|)(\lambda_1 |+> + \lambda_2 |->)[/tex]

lambda' is the complex conjugated
If I solve this I get an expression like : sqrt(a+b) wheres my a equals the realpart of my lambdas1 and b equals the real part of my lambdas2

Is that solution right or totally wrong?

Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lindsayyyy said:
Hi everyone,

Afterwards I used the definition of the scalar product to get the norm.
[tex]<\phi|\phi> = (\lambda_{1}' <+| + \lambda_{2}'<-|)(\lambda_1 |+> + \lambda_2 |->)[/tex]

lambda' is the complex conjugated
If I solve this I get an expression like : sqrt(a+b) wheres my a equals the realpart of my lambdas1 and b equals the real part of my lambdas2

Is that solution right or totally wrong?

I'm not sure what you mean when you say "If I solve this I get an expression like : sqrt(a+b) " What are you saying sqrt(a+b) should equal?

Anyway, I think the imaginary parts of each λ will be just as important as the real parts.

Note ##(\lambda_{1}' <+| + \lambda_{2}'<-|)(\lambda_1 |+> + \lambda_2 |->)## will expand to

##\lambda_{1}'\lambda_{1} <+| +> \;+ \;\lambda_{1}'\lambda_{2}<+|-> \;+ \; \lambda_{2}'\lambda_{1}<-|+> \;+ \;\lambda_{2}'\lambda_{2}<-|->##

Try to simplify this.
 
first of all: thanks for the help

Is my attempt at a solution even right? I'm uncertain if that's the right approach.

Yes, I had the expression you mentioned already, where I think I can say the following:

<+|+> and <-|-> equals 1 and <+|-> equals zeroAnd while I'm writing this down. I realized I forgot to say in my beginning post that + and - are orthonormal quantum states :/. Sorry about that.

edit: I got to the point where I have the followng left:
[tex]<\phi|\phi> = \lambda_{1}'\lambda_{1} +\lambda_{2}'\lambda_{2}[/tex]

And a complex number times its conjugated version gives me a real part only
 
Lindsayyyy said:
I got to the point where I have the followng left:
[tex]<\phi|\phi> = \lambda_{1}'\lambda_{1} +\lambda_{2}'\lambda_{2}[/tex]

And a complex number times its conjugated version gives me a real part only

That looks good. Yes, a complex number times it's conjugate gives a real number in the sense that if z = a + ib then z'z = a^2 + b^2, which includes both the real and imaginary parts of z. (I thought you might have been saying that only the real part of z would contribute to z'z.)

When you talk about "scaling" ##|\phi>##, I am guessing you are talking about what is usually called "normalizing" ##|\phi>##. So, you want to find a number, ##A##, such that if you multiply ##|\phi>## by ##A##, the resultant state vector has a norm of 1. That is, if you let ##|\psi> = A|\phi>## then ##<\psi|\psi> = 1##.
 
yes, normalizing is the word I'm looking for. I'm not a native speaker and my translation program didn't give me "to normalize" :) .

So, my attempt is right?

the normalized vector would then be:

[tex]\frac {1}{\lambda_1' \lambda_1 \lambda_2' \lambda_2} \mid \phi \rangle[/tex]

Is that correct?

Furthermore I want to calculate the possibility of |+>. I've done it with

[tex]p_n = \frac {|a_n|^2} {\sum |a_n|^2}[/tex]

where my a_n's are the coefficients.
So finally I'd get

[tex]p_+=\frac {|\lambda_1|^2}{|\lambda_1|^2+|\lambda_2|^2}[/tex]

is that correct?

Thanks for the help
 
Lindsayyyy said:
yes, normalizing is the word I'm looking for. I'm not a native speaker and my translation program didn't give me "to normalize" :) .

So, my attempt is right?

the normalized vector would then be:

[tex]\frac {1}{\lambda_1' \lambda_1 \lambda_2' \lambda_2} \mid \phi \rangle[/tex]

Is that correct?

That's not quite correct. You want to find ##A## such that ##A|\phi>## is normalized. Which means

##<\phi|A'A|\phi> = A'A<\phi|\phi> = 1##. So, ##A'A = \frac{1}{<\phi|\phi>}## You are free to choose ##A## to be a real number, so you can choose ##A^2= \frac{1}{<\phi|\phi>}##
Furthermore I want to calculate the possibility of |+>. I've done it with

[tex]p_n = \frac {|a_n|^2} {\sum |a_n|^2}[/tex]

where my a_n's are the coefficients.
So finally I'd get

[tex]p_+=\frac {|\lambda_1|^2}{|\lambda_1|^2+|\lambda_2|^2}[/tex]

is that correct?

Thanks for the help
That's correct.
 
Hm I don't understand that.

Let's take a look at "normal" vectors. When I want to normalize a vector its:

[tex]\vec v' = \frac {1}{\sqrt{a²+b²+c²}} \cdot \vec v[/tex]

doesn't that also work now for quantum states?

like in my example

[tex]\mid \phi \rangle' = \frac {1}{\sqrt{\lambda_1' \lambda_1 + \lambda_2' \lambda_2}} \cdot \mid \phi \rangle[/tex]
 
Lindsayyyy said:
Hm I don't understand that.

Let's take a look at "normal" vectors. When I want to normalize a vector its:

[tex]\vec v' = \frac {1}{\sqrt{a²+b²+c²}} \cdot \vec v[/tex]

doesn't that also work now for quantum states?

like in my example

[tex]\mid \phi \rangle' = \frac {1}{\sqrt{\lambda_1' \lambda_1 + \lambda_2' \lambda_2}} \cdot \mid \phi \rangle[/tex]
Yes, that's correct. Good.

Earlier you had
[tex]\frac {1}{\lambda_1' \lambda_1 \lambda_2' \lambda_2} \mid \phi \rangle[/tex]
 
Ah ok, I forgot the square root as well as the plus. My fault.
Thank your very much for your help o:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K