Understanding the Chain Rule in Multivariable Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter twoflower
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Chain rule
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the chain rule in the context of multivariable functions, specifically focusing on the derivative of a function of the form f(2x, 3y). Participants are exploring how to differentiate this expression and what the underlying function might look like.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to differentiate f(2x, 3y) using the chain rule and expresses confusion about the form of the function f(x, y). Some participants clarify that when differentiating with respect to one variable, the other variable is treated as a constant. Others suggest considering specific forms of f to visualize the problem better.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of the function and the differentiation process. There is an exploration of different interpretations of the function and its derivatives, but no explicit consensus has been reached regarding the original poster's approach or the specific forms of the functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that f(x, y) is a general function of two variables, and there is a request for examples to illustrate the concepts being discussed. The original poster expresses a desire for clarity on how the functions might appear in practice.

twoflower
Messages
363
Reaction score
0
Hi,
here is what I'm trying to do:

Find

[tex] \frac{\partial}{\partial x} f(2x, 3y)[/tex]

First of all, I'm confused by the

[tex] f(2x, 3y)[/tex]

How does the function look like? I imagine that it is for example

[tex] f(x,y) = cos(xy) - sin(3xy^2}[/tex]

and that therefore

[tex] f(2x, 3y) = cos(6xy) - sin(54xy^2)[/tex]

I'm confused, I don't have any good picture of how it might look in real.
Anyway, to accomplish the task:

[tex] \frac{\partial}{\partial x} f(2x, 3y) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\frac{d(2x)}{dx} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\frac{d(3y)}{dx} = 2\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}[/tex]

Is it ok? If yes, could you please give an example of this scenario? I mean, how could f(2x, 3y) and f(x,y), respectively, look like so that I could see it with the particular functions?
Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]f(x,y)[/tex] is just a function mapping of your x and y coordinates.

As for the derivative, when you take the derivative with respect to x, the y values are treated as if they were constants, same for x when you derive with respect for y.
 
ComputerGeek said:
[tex]f(x,y)[/tex] is just a function mapping of your x and y coordinates.

As for the derivative, when you take the derivative with respect to x, the y values are treated as if they were constants, same for x when you derive with respect for y.

So, is my approach ok? And how could the functions look like?

Thank you.
 
Just imagine that

v(x)=2x, and w(y)=6y

Then

f(2x,6y)=f(v(x), w(y)) for arbitrary f.


for example
if
f(x)=cos(x)
then f(v)= cos(v)=cos(2x)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K