Understanding the D = Vit + 1/2at^2 Formula | Tips and Tricks

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Leoragon
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the formula D = Vit + 1/2at², which relates distance, initial velocity, acceleration, and time. Participants explore the derivation of this formula, the necessity of calculus in understanding the concepts involved, and alternative methods to arrive at the equations without calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the derivation of the formula and requests guidance.
  • Another suggests that calculus, specifically integration, is necessary to derive the equations related to constant acceleration.
  • A participant questions whether it is possible to derive the formulas without using calculus.
  • Some participants argue that while algebra can be used to manipulate equations once one is found, calculus is essential for deriving the initial equations from first principles.
  • Discussion includes the concept of average speed and how it relates to the derivation of the distance formula.
  • One participant provides an example of calculating average velocity using weighted averages, noting that this also requires calculus for a proper derivation.
  • Another participant claims that it is possible to derive the formula without calculus by accepting certain definitions related to average velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether calculus is necessary for deriving the formulas. Some assert that it is essential, while others propose that derivations can be made using algebra under certain assumptions.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of instantaneous and average velocity, as well as the conditions under which the formulas apply. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with calculus among participants.

Leoragon
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand this formula but I'm stuck. I've looked up how to obtain the initial velocity, the acceleration, and time. But all I see are formulas, I don't know how they got it.
Can someone guide me through this please?

D = Vit + 1/2at2

Vi = (d - 1/2at2) / t

a = 2 x (d - Vit) / t2

t = -Vi / a \pm (√[\(Vi)2 + 2ad]) / a

http://http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090621164821AAHxOMD Here's my reference.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, do you know calculus? If so, consider integration of some constant acceleration a. Then the rest is algebra. For example, your V_i = (d - 1/2at^2)/t is just the first equation but solved for V_i.
 
MarneMath said:
Well, do you know calculus?

Nope, I don't. Can you get these formulas without it?
 
Well, yes and no. Once you find one equation, you can find the others by algebra. However, I don't know a way of finding one without, at the very least, using ideas from Calculus. *

*At the same time, I've never tried to find such a way, so maybe there exist a way that I'm not aware of.
 
So these are the right formulas? But where did they come from? What do they mean?
 
If you start with some speed and have a constant acceleration a, after time t your speed will be at. Since the acceleration was constant, the average speed is just the average of the starting and finishing speeds. Then the distance is just the average speed times time. Try to work it out, find the average speed times t and see what you get.
 
Because you are talking about "instantaneous" speed and acceleration, and those are concepts that cannot even be defined without appealing to some kind of Calculus or limit process, you are not going to be able to derive these equations without Calculus. As chigel says, with constant acceleration, you can average speed over an integral to be the arithetic average of the beginning and ending speeds, but showing that requires Calculus (specifically, the "mean value theorem").
 
Well I mean average velocity or acceleration. How can I find these variables using algebra if I already have the first formula (s = ut X 1/2at^2)?
 
If you are referring to weighted averages, the definition of the weighted average of a data set d is given by \displaystyle \frac{\sum w_k d_k}{\sum w_k} where w denotes the weight of each data. Taking the data set to be the velocity and the weight to be the time, one can solve a question like this:

"A car moves x distance with velocity 20 and 4x distance with velocity 40. What is the average velocity of the car?"

To solve this, we simply note that the car traveled t time with velocity 20 and 2t time with velocity 40, and hence we have the average as \displaystyle \frac{20t+80t}{t+2t}=\frac{100}{3}\approx 33.3.

However, the derivation of the weighted average requires the mean value theorem, so I do not know how useful you might find this to be.
 
  • #10
This can be done without calculus as long as you accept that with constant acceleration the average velocity Va = is 1/2 (Vi + Vf), where Vi is initial velocity and Vf is final velocity.

Va = 1/2 (Vi + Vf)
Vf = Vi + a t
Va = 1/2 (Vi + (Vi + a t)) = Vi + 1/2 a t

D = Di + Va t = Di + (Vi + 1/2 a t) t = Di + Vi t + 1/2 a t2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K