Understanding the del operator in electromagnetics

  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Del Operator
Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies that scalar and vector fields are indeed spatially dependent, meaning their values can vary at different points in space. It confirms that the gradient, divergence, and curl are point functions, yielding different results at each point. The conversation also explains the notation \nabla and \nabla', indicating operations concerning field points and source points, respectively. The example provided illustrates how functions can depend on multiple variables, including both source and field coordinates. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the del operator in electromagnetics.
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
295
Gradient is the derivative of a scalar field. Divergence and Curl are both derivative of a vector field.

1) Are "scalar field" and "vector field" imply it is spatial dependent...ie they are function of any single point in space...ie the value of scalar and vector field is different at every single point in space if it is not a constant field.

2) Does this mean all three ( Gradient, Div, Curl ) are point form?...ie each point give different result.

3) Is "point form" means the function is different at every single individual point in space?

4) In electromagnetics, there are \nabla' that represent operation respect to source point and \nabla represent operation respect to field point of interest. I am confuse with this. Can anyone explain this?I just want to have a clearer understanding of the del operator.

Thanks

Alan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From a mathematical point of view, the answers to your first three questions are all yes. I'll leave your last question to a physicist.
 
mathman said:
From a mathematical point of view, the answers to your first three questions are all yes. I'll leave your last question to a physicist.

Thanks for clearing these up.

Alan
 
Be careful. When saying that something is a function of space means that it can have a different value at each point. It does not follow that it cannot have the same value at two distinct points nor does it mean the function cannot be a "constant" function- the same at all points.
 
yungman said:
4) In electromagnetics, there are \nabla' that represent operation respect to source point and \nabla represent operation respect to field point of interest. I am confuse with this. Can anyone explain this?

Essentially, in this case there is a function g of both \mathbf{r} = (x,y,z) and \mathbf{r'}=(x',y',z'). In other words

g(\mathbf{r,r'}) = g(x,y,z,x',y',z').

Here is what the notation you asked about means:

\nabla g(\mathbf{r, r'}) = \hat{x} \frac{\partial g}{\partial x} + \hat{y} \frac{\partial g}{\partial y} + \hat{z} \frac{\partial g}{\partial z}

\nabla' g(\mathbf{r, r'}) = \hat{x} \frac{\partial g}{\partial x'} + \hat{y} \frac{\partial g}{\partial y'} + \hat{z} \frac{\partial g}{\partial z'}

Yes, the primed coordinates are very often used for source locations.

Similar kinds of notation can be used as well in other contexts. For example, in kinetic theory we see functions of position, velocity and time, f(\mathbf{r,v},t). Here \mathbf{v} = (v_x, v_y, v_z). In this case,

\nabla f(\mathbf{r, v},t) = \hat{x} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} + \hat{y} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} + \hat{z} \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}

\nabla_{\mathbf{v}} f(\mathbf{r, v},t) = \hat{x} \frac{\partial f}{\partial v_x} + \hat{y} \frac{\partial f}{\partial v_y} + \hat{z} \frac{\partial f}{\partial v_z}


Good luck,

Jason
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K