MHB Understanding the derivative of natural log function

Click For Summary
The derivative of the natural logarithm function ln(x) is 1/x because it represents the rate of change of ln(x) with respect to x, which varies as x changes. In contrast, ln(4) is a constant, and the derivative of any constant is 0, explaining why the derivative of ln(4) is not 1/4. The confusion arises from treating constants like variables; however, constants do not change, hence their derivatives are zero. Understanding the derivative involves recognizing that it measures the slope of the function at a specific point, not the function itself. This clarification helps in grasping the algebraic form of the derivative of ln(x).
m3dicat3d
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hope this is in the right place... I'm trying to understand why the derivative of ln(x) is 1/x while the derivative of something like ln(4) is 0. My knee-jerk reaction is to view 4 as representative of x, thereby giving me F'(x) ln(4) = 1/4, not 0. That would be the case, except ln(4) is a constant. Since I understand that ln(4) is a constant, the derivative should in fact be a zero. So maybe what is confusing me is why do we have the algebraic version of F'(x) ln(x) = 1/x in the first place (unless x represents another function instead of a number)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: understanding the derivative of natural log function

m3dicat3d said:
Hope this is in the right place... I'm trying to understand why the derivative of ln(x) is 1/x while the derivative of something like ln(4) is 0. My knee-jerk reaction is to view 4 as representative of x, thereby giving me F'(x) ln(4) = 1/4, not 0. That would be the case, except ln(4) is a constant. Since I understand that ln(4) is a constant, the derivative should in fact be a zero. So maybe what is confusing me is why do we have the algebraic version of F'(x) ln(x) = 1/x in the first place (unless x represents another function instead of a number)?

Imagine the derivative as being the gradient of an expression as per it's first principles. The graph of a the constant $y=a$ is a horizontal line so it has a gradient of $\dfrac{0}{\Delta x} = 0$ so long as $\Delta x \neq 0$.

When you take the derivative of $f(x)$ w.r.t $x$ at a given point P you're evaluating the gradient of f(x) at P, it's a point on a graph rather than a whole graph itself.

Strictly speaking of course the derivative of the natural logarithm is $\dfrac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$ because of the chain rule.
 
Re: understanding the derivative of natural log function

Thanks for the reply, I just starting writing out a long winded reply as to what I didn't understand, and in the process I thought through the matter more and ended up understanding it haha!

[moderator edit] The discussion regarding the posting issue has been moved here:

http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f25/unable-enter-carriage-return-into-my-posts-4787/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K