Understanding the Difference Between Bending Stress and Normal Stress in Beams

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between bending stress and normal stress in beams, emphasizing that bending stress (σ) is not equivalent to normal stress. Normal stress affects the beam's length without causing bending, while bending stress results in curvature due to differential elongation and shortening across the beam's cross-section. The key assumption is that flat cross-sections remain flat post-deformation, which is crucial for understanding normal bending versus shear deformation. This differentiation is vital for accurate structural analysis in engineering applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beam mechanics and stress analysis
  • Familiarity with bending stress and normal stress concepts
  • Knowledge of deformation types in structural engineering
  • Basic principles of material mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of "normal bending" in beam theory
  • Explore the effects of shear stress in short beams
  • Learn about the assumptions in beam deformation analysis
  • Investigate the relationship between stress distribution and beam curvature
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and professionals involved in beam design and analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focusing on stress and deformation in structural elements.

chetzread
Messages
798
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bending
[/B]
form the link, we know that σ represent the bending stress, I'm wondering can I call the bending stress as normal stress act at the cross sectional area of beam?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


IMO, they are not the same...Because the normal stress act on the cross sectional of beam will only cause the beam to elongate or shorten, it will not cause it to bend , so they are not the same...
 

Attachments

  • 350.PNG
    350.PNG
    11.9 KB · Views: 492
Physics news on Phys.org
chetzread said:

Homework Statement



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bending
[/B]
form the link, we know that σ represent the bending stress, I'm wondering can I call the bending stress as normal stress act at the cross sectional area of beam?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


IMO, they are not the same...Because the normal stress act on the cross sectional of beam will only cause the beam to elongate or shorten, it will not cause it to bend , so they are not the same...
If there is tensile stress perpendicular to the beam cross sections in the upper half of the beam, and compressive stress in the bottom half of the beam, the upper half of the beam will get longer and the bottom half of the beam will get shorter. This geometrically means that the beam is bent.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
Chestermiller said:
If there is tensile stress perpendicular to the beam cross sections in the upper half of the beam, and compressive stress in the bottom half of the beam, the upper half of the beam will get longer and the bottom half of the beam will get shorter. This geometrically means that the beam is bent.
I agreed, but, it only means the beam is sheared , but not bent like U shape, right?
 
chetzread said:
I agreed, but, it only means the beam is sheared , but not bent like U shape, right?
why you said that it's bent?
 
chetzread said:
why you said that it's bent?
The key assumption involved here is the flat cross sections of the beam remain flat after the deformation has occurred. Can you tell me how the cross sections can remain flat while the upper part of the beam gets longer and the bottom part of the beam gets shorter without the beam developing curvature (i.e., bending)?

Your reference fails to mention this key assumption (that is actually observed in practice). Therefore, I can see the source of your confusion regarding the deformation being shear. "Shear bending" does actually occur in very short beams, but in long slender beams, the dominant mode of deformation is "normal bending".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
Chestermiller said:
The key assumption involved here is the flat cross sections of the beam remain flat after the deformation has occurred. Can you tell me how the cross sections can remain flat while the upper part of the beam gets longer and the bottom part of the beam gets shorter without the beam developing curvature (i.e., bending)?
initially, i was thinking that the author mean this, so the object is sheared , but not bent (figure above)
But, it should look like this,right? (figure below)
 

Attachments

  • 353.png
    353.png
    12.7 KB · Views: 534
chetzread said:
initially, i was thinking that the author mean this, so the object is sheared , but not bent (figure above)
But, it should look like this,right? (figure below)
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K