Understanding the Different Types of Energy in a System: An Exploration

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mather
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energies
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the various types of energy in a system, including free Gibbs energy, enthalpy, entropy, and others. Participants explore the definitions, purposes, and implications of these different forms of energy within the context of thermodynamics and conservation laws.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of different types of energy, suggesting that energy stems from the movements and potential energies of a system's components.
  • Another participant describes energy as a "bookkeeping" device, implying that new types of energy are defined to maintain the principle of conservation when it appears violated.
  • A later reply emphasizes the deeper implications of energy conservation, linking it to the invariance of mechanical interactions over time.
  • Another participant elaborates on the internal energy of a system and its relationship to heat and work, providing a mathematical framework based on the first law of thermodynamics.
  • One participant explains that enthalpy is useful for measuring energy changes at constant pressure, contrasting it with the challenges of maintaining constant volume.
  • Another point raised is that for every combination of thermodynamic state variables, there exists a corresponding free energy, suggesting flexibility in defining energies based on specific conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature and necessity of various types of energy, with some proposing that they are defined for specific purposes while others challenge the underlying assumptions about energy conservation and definitions.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific thermodynamic principles and mathematical relationships, indicating a reliance on particular definitions and assumptions that may not be universally accepted or resolved within the discussion.

mather
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
hello!

I come across various "energies", like free Gibbs energy, enthalpy, entropy, etc (okay, to be precise, entropic energy, enthalpic energy, internal enegry, etc)

I wonder, why all these energies?

the energy of a system stems from the movements of its components and the potential energies of its components, that's it. Am I wrong?

please elaborate

thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
"Energy" is essentially a "bookkeepping" device. Everytime we run across a situation in which it looks like energy was not conserved, we define a new type of energy so that it is.
 
HallsofIvy said:
"Energy" is essentially a "bookkeepping" device. Everytime we run across a situation in which it looks like energy was not conserved, we define a new type of energy so that it is.

Lol. that makes it sound like we have a choice in the matter. I'd substitute 'discover' for 'define'.

Ultimately, conservation of energy stems from the invariance of mechanical interactions with respect to time. It's a bit deeper than just 'Kinetic Energy plus Potential Energy'
 
AJ Bentley said:
Ultimately, conservation of energy stems from the invariance of mechanical interactions with respect to time. It's a bit deeper than just 'Kinetic Energy plus Potential Energy'

And ultimately, because we can add arbitrary divergence terms to the lagrangian of our theory, what we get out as the noether current for time translation invariance is somewhat arbitrary.
 
mather said:
I come across various "energies", like free Gibbs energy, enthalpy, entropy, etc (okay, to be precise, entropic energy, enthalpic energy, internal enegry, etc)

I wonder, why all these energies?

They are defined for different purposes. Let me show you an example:

The internal energy U of a system is the sum of all of its energies. According to the first law of thermodynamics its change is equal to heat and work exchanged with other systems:

dU = dq + dw

and if there is only volumetric work

dU = dq - p·dV

Now let's assume we want to measure the change of U using a calorimeter. The calorimeter measures the heat only. Therefore the volume must be kept constant to get

dU = dq

But keeping the volume constant is very difficult. In contrast keeping the pressure constant is quite easy - just by letting the atmosphere do the job. Therefore it would be useful if we would have some kind of energy whose change is equal to the heat at constant pressure. That's the origin of enthalpy:

H = U + p·V

dH = dw - p·dV + p·dV + V·dp = dw + V·dp
 
For every combination of thermodynamic state variables, there's a corresponding free energy where these variables are held constant. Enthalpy, Gibb's free energy, and Helmholtz free energy are just some of the most common free energies, but you are free to make up your own, particularly if you are dealing with unusual state variables in your system (for example, if your system were in some kind of water level equilibrium or something).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K