Understanding the Dot Product of Derivatives in Astrodynamics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical expression \(\vec{a}\cdot \vec{\dot{a}}=a \dot{a}\) in the context of astrodynamics. The user initially questions the validity of this statement, suspecting a notational issue. Upon further reflection, they conclude that the right side represents the time derivative of the magnitude of vector \(\vec{a}\), rather than the magnitude of the time derivative of \(\vec{a}\). This clarification resolves the confusion surrounding the relationship between a vector and its time derivative.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus
  • Familiarity with astrodynamics concepts
  • Knowledge of time derivative notation
  • Basic grasp of vector magnitudes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector derivatives in physics
  • Learn about the application of dot products in astrodynamics
  • Explore the concept of vector magnitudes and their derivatives
  • Investigate the implications of vector notation in mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in astrodynamics, as well as mathematicians interested in vector calculus and its applications.

Nabeshin
Science Advisor
Messages
2,207
Reaction score
16
In reading a book on astrodynamics I came across the following statement:
[tex]\vec{a}\cdot \vec{\dot{a}}=a \dot{a}[/tex]

Where the dotting is the time derivative notation.

I put a picture of the original text up, and it's the statement right in the middle:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v715/deagleman9/IMG_1178.jpg
Except they use bold to indicate vectors.

Can anyone explain to me why this should be true? It seems akin to saying the angle between a vector and its time derivative is always 90, which is obviously not true. I've also considered it might be a notational problem with the unbolded quantities. At any rate, does anyone know what's going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, I think I figured this one out. I think the right side is the time derivative of the magnitude of a, rather than the magnitude of the time derivative of a.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
18K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K