Understanding the Free Fall Timescale Equation: Explanation and Derivation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Stratosphere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Free fall
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and understanding of the free fall timescale equation, specifically \( t_{ff}=\sqrt{\frac{3\pi}{32g\overline{\rho}} \). Participants explore the mathematical steps involved in deriving this equation from gravitational acceleration principles, focusing on the integration process and the conditions of free fall.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the integration process needed to derive the free fall timescale from the gravitational force equation \( -\frac{GM}{r^{2}} \).
  • There are discussions about the boundary conditions for the definite integral, with participants unsure about how to apply them correctly.
  • Some participants suggest that the problem involves finding the time it takes for an outer shell to collapse under gravity, starting from rest.
  • Multiple participants attempt to clarify the steps needed to solve the differential equation \( \frac{d^2r}{dt^2} = -\frac{GM}{r^2} \) and how to integrate it correctly.
  • There are repeated requests for clarification on the integration process and the relationship between velocity and radius during free fall.
  • Some participants question the validity of each other's steps and seek further explanation on how to derive velocity from the gravitational equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to derive the free fall timescale from gravitational principles, but there is significant disagreement and confusion regarding the integration steps and the application of boundary conditions. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on how to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions involved in the integration process and the definitions of variables used in the equations. There are unresolved mathematical steps that contribute to the confusion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals interested in gravitational physics, calculus, and the mathematical modeling of free fall dynamics.

Stratosphere
Messages
373
Reaction score
0
I've seen this equation in a book once but I can't seem to find a good explanation of how it was derived.


[tex]\ t_{ff}=\sqrt{\frac{3\pi}{32g\overline{\rho}}}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-fall_time"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In the book I have it derives it from the acceleration due to gravity equations. There is only one part about it I don't get though.

[tex]-\frac{GM}{r^{2}}[/tex] Then it says to do this.

[tex]\int^{R}_{t=0} -\frac{GM}{r^{2}}dr[/tex]

The boundary conditions are r=R and when t=0, I don't understand what to do for the definite integral. I can integrate but I don't know what to plug in. The question you're suppose to get is different than the one I originally posted.

[tex]\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{R^{3}}{GM}}[/tex]
 
It's a bit of a calculus problem. You are trying to find the time it takes for the outer shell to collapse under the influence of the gravity of the mass below it. You have the acceleration of gravity (thus d2r/dt2) as a function of r:
Stratosphere said:
[tex]-\frac{GM}{r^{2}}[/tex]
Given that, you need to solve for the time it takes to go from r = R to r = 0, starting from rest.
 
[tex]\int^{R}_{0} -\frac{GM}{r^{2}}dr[/tex]

Like this? If I integrate this I get stumped at this,

[tex]-GM\left[-\frac{1}{r} \right]\right|^{R}_{0}[/tex]

What do I plug in for r?
 
Stratosphere said:
[tex]\int^{R}_{0} -\frac{GM}{r^{2}}dr[/tex]

Like this? If I integrate this I get stumped at this,

[tex]-GM\left[-\frac{1}{r} \right]\right|^{R}_{0}[/tex]

What do I plug in for r?
No, you need to solve this equation:

[tex]\frac{d^2r}{dt^2} = -\frac{GM}{r^2}[/tex]

One way to solve it is in stages, starting with the trick of using a = dv/dt = v dv/dr.
 
Sorry I have to ask but, how do I solve it?
 
Stratosphere said:
Sorry I have to ask but, how do I solve it?
It's a bit of a pain. I'll start you off:

[tex]\frac{dv}{dt} = v \frac{dv}{dr} = -\frac{GM}{r^2}[/tex]

First solve that for v in terms of r. Then use v = dr/dt, and solve that to get the time.
 
I've got that

[tex]\frac{dv}{dt}=-\frac{GM}{r^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]v=\frac{\sqrt{GM}}{r}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dv}{dr}=-\frac{\sqrt{GM}}{r}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dr}{dt}=\frac{\sqrt{GM}}{r}[/tex]

How do I get time?
 
  • #10
Did I do something wrong?
 
  • #11
Stratosphere said:
I've got that

[tex]\frac{dv}{dt}=-\frac{GM}{r^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]v=\frac{\sqrt{GM}}{r}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dv}{dr}=-\frac{\sqrt{GM}}{r}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dr}{dt}=\frac{\sqrt{GM}}{r}[/tex]

How do I get time?
How did you go from the first equation to the second? Please explain each step so I can see what you're trying to do.
 
  • #12
Doc Al said:
How did you go from the first equation to the second? Please explain each step so I can see what you're trying to do.

[tex]\frac{dv}{dt}=-\frac{GM}{r^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\int -\frac{GM}{r^{2}}dr[/tex]

[tex]=v=\frac{\sqrt{GM}}{r}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dv}{dr}=-\frac{GM}{r^{2}}\cdot\frac{r}{\sqrt{GM}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dv}{dr}=-\frac{\sqrt{GM}}{r^{2}}[/tex]
 
  • #13
Sorry, but I'm still struggling to understand what you are doing here.
Stratosphere said:
[tex]\frac{dv}{dt}=-\frac{GM}{r^{2}}[/tex]
This is the starting point. OK.

[tex]\int -\frac{GM}{r^{2}}dr[/tex]
Not sure what you mean here. Are you taking the integral of both sides with respect to dr? (Where's the equation?)

[tex]=v=\frac{\sqrt{GM}}{r}[/tex]
How did you get here?
 
  • #14
Doc Al said:
Not sure what you mean here. Are you taking the integral of both sides with respect to dr? (Where's the equation?)

I took the integral of [tex]\frac{dv}{dt}[/tex] shouldn't that give me v? Maybe that's were I'm confused. [tex]\int-\frac{GM}{r^{2}}dr=\frac{GM}{r}[/tex].

It looks like [tex]\frac{dr}{dr}=GMLog(r)[/tex] to get that I did:

[tex]\int -\frac{GM}{r^{2}}dr=\frac{GM}{r}[/tex]

[tex]\int\frac{GM}{r}dr=GMLog(r)[/tex]

So [tex]v=\frac{GM}{r}[/tex],
 
  • #15
Stratosphere said:
I took the integral of [tex]\frac{dv}{dt}[/tex] shouldn't that give me v? Maybe that's were I'm confused.
If you were integrating with respect to t that would be true, but you're integrating with respect to r.

[tex]\frac{dv}{dt} dr = v dv[/tex]

See post #8.
 
  • #16
Doc Al said:
If you were integrating with respect to t that would be true, but you're integrating with respect to r.

[tex]\frac{dv}{dt} dr = v dv[/tex]

See post #8.

So you're saying that I need to integrate with respect to r? How do I do that?

[tex]-\frac{GM}{r^{2}}\cdot GMlog(r)[/tex]

Is that right? Does [tex]dv=GMlog(r)[/tex]?
 
  • #17
Stratosphere said:
So you're saying that I need to integrate with respect to r? How do I do that?
From an earlier post:

[tex]\frac{dv}{dt} = v \frac{dv}{dr} = -\frac{GM}{r^2}[/tex]

Integrate both sides with respect to dr:

[tex]\int \frac{dv}{dt} dr= \int v \frac{dv}{dr} dr = \int -\frac{GM}{r^2} dr[/tex]

[tex]\int v dv = \int -\frac{GM}{r^2} dr[/tex]

(This is just the beginning. This is a several step calculus problem.)
 
  • #18
I will try to solve it but now I'm completely confused as to what I'm trying to do. Could you restate the problem?
 
  • #19
The question is: How long does it take the radius to collapse from a value of R to a value of zero?

So, ultimately you are looking for a time as the answer.
 
  • #20
Stratosphere said:
Could you restate the problem?
To add to Redbelly98's statement, take a look at post #4.

Think of it like this: Imagine you are standing on a planet that has just collapsed, so nothing is holding you up. Assume that all the mass has collapsed to a point. How long would it take for you to fall (you're in free fall, thus the name) from your initial position on the surface at r = R to the center of the collapsed planet at r = 0?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K