Understanding the Kronecker Delta Symbol: A_j Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter tony873004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Symbol
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Kronecker delta symbol and its application in summation notation, specifically in the context of manipulating expressions involving indexed variables such as \( A_k \). Participants are exploring the implications of summing over indices and the correct interpretation of the delta function in relation to these indices.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the correct summation process involving the Kronecker delta, questioning the repeated index and its implications on the resulting expression. There are attempts to clarify the distinction between fixed and repeated indices in summation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the summation convention and the role of the Kronecker delta, while others express confusion about the terminology and concepts being discussed. There is an ongoing effort to clarify these points without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes the absence of a textbook, relying solely on class notes, which may contribute to the confusion regarding the summation convention and the interpretation of the delta function.

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> \delta _{jk} A_k \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \delta _{jk} A_k = \left( {\delta _{1,1} + \delta _{1,2} + \delta _{1,3} + \delta _{2,1} + \delta _{2,2} + \delta _{2,3} + \delta _{3,1} + \delta _{3,2} + \delta _{3,3} } \right)A_k \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = \left( {1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1} \right)A_k \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = 3A_k \\ <br /> \end{array}<br />

But the answer should be A_j. Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I know, the sum is only over k, not j.
 
That's true, and you also need to recognize that A_k has different values for different terms in the sum.
 
and to further add, the delta will only be 1 when k=j in the sum.
 
Sorry, I don't understand your explanations. We don't have a textbook for this, only class notes. So I don't even know what "the sum is over k" means. Is it possible to work out the example? Thanks!
 
The sum is always only over a repeated index, the other indices are fixed. For example suppose A is a 2x2 matrix and x is a 2-vector:

A_{ij} x_j = \sum_{j=1}^2 A_{ij} x_j = A_{i1} x_1 + A_{i2} x_2
 
really your only problem is that you summed over j
 
tony873004 said:
Sorry, I don't understand your explanations. We don't have a textbook for this, only class notes. So I don't even know what "the sum is over k" means. Is it possible to work out the example? Thanks!

Hi tony873004! :smile:

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_summation_convention" :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tony873004 said:
<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> \delta _{jk} A_k \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \delta _{jk} A_k = \left( {\delta _{1,1} + \delta _{1,2} + \delta _{1,3} + \delta _{2,1} + \delta _{2,2} + \delta _{2,3} + \delta _{3,1} + \delta _{3,2} + \delta _{3,3} } \right)A_k \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = \left( {1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1} \right)A_k \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = 3A_k \\ <br /> \end{array}<br />
No. As others have said, the sum is over k, the repeated index, not i.
\delta_{ik}A_k= (A_{i1}A_1+ A_{i2}A_2+ A_{i3}A_3[/itex]<br /> for every i. That is<br /> \delta_{1k}A_k= A_{11}A_1+ A_{12}A_2+ A_{13}A_3= A_1<br /> \delta_{2k}A_k= A_{21}A_1+ A_{22}A_2+ A_{23}A_3= A_2<br /> \delta_{3k}A_3= A_{21}A_1+ A_{32}A_2+ A_{33}A_3= A_3<br /> That is, it is the vector &amp;lt;A_1, A_2, A_3&amp;gt; which can be written as A_i or A_j as they mean the same thing.<br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> But the answer should be A_j. Where did I go wrong? </div> </div> </blockquote>
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K