Understanding the Laplace Transform: Derivation of n!/(s-a)^(n+1) for t^n*e^(at)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Laplace transform of the function t^n e^(at) is derived as L[t^n e^(at)] = n!/(s - a)^(n+1). This conclusion is reached through integration by parts, where the term e^((s-a)t) is simplified after n iterations. The proof employs induction, starting from the base case for n=0 and assuming the formula holds for n, then proving it for n+1. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying integration limits and the properties of the Laplace transform.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms
  • Familiarity with integration by parts
  • Knowledge of the Gamma function and its relation to factorials
  • Basic principles of mathematical induction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Laplace transform, specifically L{e^(at)f(t)} = F(s-a)
  • Explore advanced integration techniques, particularly integration by parts
  • Learn about the Gamma function and its applications in calculus
  • Review mathematical induction proofs in the context of series and sequences
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, and anyone involved in control theory or differential equations who seeks to deepen their understanding of Laplace transforms and their applications.

Tony11235
Messages
254
Reaction score
0
laplace transform

Could anyone should me how it is you arrive to \frac{n!}{(s - a)^{n+1}} as being the laplace transform of t^n e^{at} ? Or at least provide a link?
I've done integration by parts but the term e^{(s-a)t} will not go away.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If n is an integer the e^{(a-s)t} term will go away after n iterations of integration by parts and one final integration of the term itself.
 
Last edited:
So far I have \int t^n e^{(s-a)t} dt = \frac{t^n e^{(s-a)t}}{s-a} - \frac{n t^{n-1} e^{(s-a)t}}{(s-a)^{2}} + \frac{(n^2-n) t^{n-2} e^{(s-a)t}}{(s-a)^{3}} . . . . . . .. I'm just not seeing how e^{(s-a)t} goes away.
 
Last edited:
I think the easiest way is to do it in pieces.

prove L[ t^n ] = n!/s^(n+1).

This is easy if you know
n! = \Gamma ( n+1 ) = \int_0^{\infty} t^n exp(-t) dt
otherwise an inductive proof on n is pretty straight forward.

Then i would show if L[f(t)] = F(s) then L[f(t)exp(at)] = F(s-a). Since this is just a relable-ing operation it should
be easy to show.
 
Last edited:
an inductive proof

EDIT: changed the limits of integration to be from 0 to infinity (instead of -infinity to infinity).

The Laplace transform of t^n e^{at} is

\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^n e^{at} e^{-st}dt=\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^n e^{(a-s)t} = \frac{n!}{(s - a)^{n+1}}

an inductive proof goes as follows:

i. For n=0, \int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^0 e^{(a-s)t}= \frac{1}{s - a} \left[ e^{(a-s)t} \right]_{t=0}^{\infty} = \frac{0!}{(s - a)^{0+1}}

ii. Assume that

\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^n e^{(a-s)t} = \frac{n!}{(s - a)^{n+1}}

holds for some fixed integer n >0, then

\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^{n+1} e^{(a-s)t} dt= \left[ -\frac{t^{n+1}e^{(a-s)t}}{s-a}\right]_{t=0}^{\infty} + \frac{n+1}{s-a}\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^{n} e^{(a-s)t} dt

which, by hypothesis,

= \frac{n+1}{s-a}\frac{n!}{(s - a)^{n+1}} = \frac{(n+1)!}{(s - a)^{(n+1)+1}}

and so

\int_{t=0}^{\infty} t^n e^{(a-s)t} = \frac{n!}{(s - a)^{n+1}}

holds for every non-negative integer n by induction.
 
Last edited:
Tony11235 said:
So far I have \int t^n e^{(s-a)t} dt = \frac{t^n e^{(s-a)t}}{s-a} - \frac{n t^n e^{(s-a)t}}{(s-a)^{2}} + \frac{(n^2-n) t^n e^{(s-a)t}}{(s-a)^{3}} . . . . . . .. I'm just not seeing how e^{(s-a)t} goes away.


Remember that you differentiate the t^n term each iteration of integration by parts, so the exponent of t should decrese by one for successive terms in the above sum, after n such terms the exponent of t will be 0 leaving only the exponential to integrate.
 
Nice advice, but I was instructed to derive the laplace transform from integration by parts, or else I would have used the property, If L{f(x)} = F(s), then L{(e^at)f(x)} = F(s-a).
 
benorin said:
Remember that you differentiate the t^n term each iteration of integration by parts, so the exponent of t should decrese by one for successive terms in the above sum, after n such terms the exponent of t will be 0 leaving only the exponential to integrate.

Sorry, that was a typo.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K