Understanding the Movement of a Unique Clock

  • Thread starter Thread starter hms.tech
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clock Work
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 2K views
hms.tech
Messages
246
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


see attachment
Time.PNG


Homework Equations



θ= ω*τ

The Attempt at a Solution



Nothing. Instead I have some queries about the question itself :
1.Is this a proper clock, will it show the correct time as any normal clock ?
2.what is the angular displacement of one of the clock hand when it moves from 1 to 2.
Is this angular displacement constant every 5 minutes (ie from 1 to 2 , 2 to 3 , 3 to 4 etc ).
 
on Phys.org
hms.tech said:

Homework Statement


see attachment
View attachment 54960

Homework Equations



θ= ω*τ

The Attempt at a Solution



Nothing. Instead I have some queries about the question itself :
1.Is this a proper clock, will it show the correct time as any normal clock ?
2.what is the angular displacement of one of the clock hand when it moves from 1 to 2.
Is this angular displacement constant every 5 minutes (ie from 1 to 2 , 2 to 3 , 3 to 4 etc ).

1. For the purposes of this question, you may assume that the *hour* will be shown exactly on the hour, ditto with the minutes in multiples of five. The interpolations between markings may not be exact, but you needn't concern yourself with this.

2. What would this be in a "regular" circular clock? Would you expect it to be different here?

3. Why wouldn't it be?
 
Curious3141 said:
1. For the purposes of this question, you may assume that the *hour* will be shown exactly on the hour, ditto with the minutes in multiples of five. The interpolations between markings may not be exact, but you needn't concern yourself with this.

2. What would this be in a "regular" circular clock? Would you expect it to be different here?

3. Why wouldn't it be?

we'll consider the time in seconds for easiness.

w= ∏/30 rad per second

More help required ...
 
NascentOxygen said:
When a hand points to 12, it forms an angle with the vertical of 0°.
When a hand points to 1, it forms an angle with the vertical of ??°[/size]
When a hand points to 2, it forms an angle with the vertical of ??°[/size]


When it points to one, it forms an angle of ∏/6
When it points to two, it forms and angle with the vertical of ∏/3
 
NascentOxygen said:
So you can now on the clock face draw some triangles showing lengths and angles, for a hand pointing to 1, and also for it pointing to 2.

Aren't these angles only applicable to a normal "round clock" ?
 
hms.tech said:
Aren't these angles only applicable to a normal "round clock" ?

These angles are applicable to this clock, because you're told the hands move like a normal (round) clock.

You might find it easier to visualise the problem if you express everything in degrees. Consider the hand at position "n" and then at position "n+2" (two markings apart). What's the angle between those two positions?

Do you see a special triangle here? This makes things quite easy, along with some very simple trig.

You could take up LCKurtz's suggestion to draw a round clock, but personally, I think it might complicate things if you clutter the figure with a circle. I would suggest just drawing the rectangle and the various triangles within it and treating the problem as simple geometry and trig.