Understanding the Ordered Basis in Linear Algebra

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of an ordered basis in linear algebra, exploring its significance beyond the basic definition of a basis that is simply ordered. Participants examine the implications of ordering in the context of vector representation and linear transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of distinguishing an ordered basis from a regular basis, suggesting that any basis can be ordered arbitrarily.
  • Another participant argues that the distinction is important for clarity and uniqueness in representation, noting that an ordered basis allows for consistent expression of vectors in terms of basis vectors.
  • A further contribution explains that changing the order of basis vectors alters the corresponding numerical representation of vectors and matrices, emphasizing the need to specify both the basis and its order for accurate communication.
  • One participant concludes that without an ordering, discussing a finite basis becomes impractical, as it complicates the indexing and representation of elements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of ordering in the context of vector representation and linear transformations, though the initial necessity of the distinction is debated.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the foundational question of why the distinction is made in linear algebra texts, leaving some assumptions about the nature of ordering and its implications unexamined.

dmuthuk
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
Hi, I was just wondering if there is something more to the concept of an ordered basis other than the fact that it is simply a basis which is ordered. The reason I'm asking this is because I don't know why some linear algebra books consider this important enough to make the distinction. I mean, given a basis for a finite-dimensional vector space, we can always order it any way we choose. In fact, whenever we talk about a finite set in general, we automatically give it an ordering so we are able to talk about it meaningfully.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is just to avoid some confusion. It is used both for identification and for uniqueness. Say we have an ordered basis {v1,v2,v3}. We say each vector v may be written
v=a1v1+a2v2+a3v3. Now in speaking of v we avoid constantly making comments like with "no to basis vectors equal" and "with the basis vectors ordered as before".
 
So, in lurflurf's example we could write v as (a1, a2, a3). Using the same basis vectors but with a different order would interchange those numbers. Also, a linear transformation, from one vector space to another, can be written as matrix given a basis for each space. Of course, the matrix depends upon the basis and upon the order. Using exactly the same bases but changing the order would interchange the numbers in the matrix representation.
To use those representations, vectors as ordered n-tuples and matrices we must specify not just the basis but the order of the basis vectors.
 
Thanks. That clears it up for me. So, I guess specifying a finite basis without an ordering is not very useful. I mean, I don't even see a way to talk about any finite set without first indexing the elements and assuming the natural ordering.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K