High School Understanding the Quadratic Form Identity in Two-Variable Equations

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding a quadratic form identity involving a function w that depends on two variables. It is noted that if B is bounded in L2, the identity holds on S, raising questions about its relation to the two variables. The continuity of w suggests that it acts as an identity operator on L2(X), implying that both terms yield the same result for every vector. Participants seek clarification on proving this identity and its implications regarding the association of complex numbers with function pairs. The conversation also touches on the Dirac notation and its application to the functions involved.
Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
TL;DR
could you explain why this equality is a quadratic form identity?
Summary: could you explain why this equality is a quadratic form identity?

i read this equality (4.26) here w depends on two variables. it is written that if B is bounded (L2) then it is a quadratic form identity on S. what does it mean? is it related to the two variables?
next the author writes that if w is continuous in the variable we have an identity operator on L2(X). does il mean that for every vector the two terms give a same result? how to prove that?

thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heidi said:
Summary: could you explain why this equality is a quadratic form identity?

i read this equality (4.26) here w depends on two variables. it is written that if B is bounded (L2) then it is a quadratic form identity on S. what does it mean? is it related to the two variables?
next the author writes that if w is continuous in the variable we have an identity operator on L2(X). does il mean that for every vector the two terms give a same result? how to prove that?

thanks a lot.
Link does not seem to be working. Please use a screenshot or something else.
 
is there a problem for everybody? (it works for me).
 
Didn't work here either for the first time. The second time worked. Don't ask me why. FF-effect maybe.
https://books.google.fr/books?id=uZdNtduC5NAC&pg=PA103#v=onepage&q&f=false
1567807416884.png

1567807189576.png


1567807336013.png
 
What is ##\chi##?
 
it may be identified with R`^d
 
Does it mean in the first case that we have a same way to associate a complex number to each couple f1, f2 of function? the dirac notation would be <f1|B|f2>
and in the second case the same function noted B|f> ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K