Understanding the Role of Ro in Amplifier Design

  • Thread starter Thread starter null void
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the role of the output resistance (Ro) in amplifier design, specifically in the context of calculating input and output impedances, as well as amplification factors in a transistor circuit. Participants explore various calculations and assumptions related to these parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates IB, IC, and re using KVL and assumes VBE = 0.7 V, leading to specific values for these parameters.
  • Another participant proposes that Ro is equal to 1/hoe, which influences the calculation of Zout.
  • There is a discussion about the correct use of hfe in calculations, with one participant suggesting it should be (hfe + 1) in certain contexts.
  • Concerns are raised about the inclusion of capacitors in the calculations for Zin and Zout, with uncertainty about their impact.
  • One participant mentions that the circuit is saturated, which affects the validity of certain calculations and assumptions made earlier.
  • Another participant questions the formula used for re, suggesting it should be based on IE rather than IC, but acknowledges that the difference may be negligible for large hfe values.
  • There is a suggestion that a negative VCE would indicate the circuit is not functioning as an amplifier, raising questions about circuit stability with added components.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct formulas and assumptions for calculating parameters in the amplifier design. There is no consensus on the correct approach to take regarding Ro, re, and the impact of circuit saturation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential limitations in their calculations, including assumptions about the thermal voltage and the specific model of the transistor being used. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the effects of circuit modifications on amplifier behavior.

null void
Messages
102
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


M.aspx?v=8c69658f5c99a57da89d.jpg


i) I am to find IB, IC and re
ii) Determine Zin and Zout

The Attempt at a Solution



To find IB,

i)

I use the KVL, start from base

V2 = IB R1 + VBE ,
I assume my VBE = 0.7 V
IB = 23.8462 μA

then my IC = IB HFE
IC = 2.3846 mA

For re = 26m V / IC
re = 10.9 Ω


ii)

Zin = RB // Hie
Hie = Hfe re = 1090 Ω
Zin = 1.087 kΩ

Zout = RC...I think this is where i need to use ro, but i have no idea wat is it referring to...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Ro is 1/hoe.
 
If it is 1/Hoe, then the Zout

Zo = ro // RC
Zo = 4.012 kΩ

then i will proceed to the next part,
iii) calculate Av and Ai

Ib = Vin / Hie
Vout = -hfe Ib (ro // RC)
= -hfe ( Vin / Hie ) (ro // RC)

Av = Vout / Vin
=- hfe / hie (ro // RC)
= -368.114 ...Awkward number...

for Ai,

Iin = Vin / 390k + Vin 1090
= Vin (1/390K + 1/1090)

Iout = IRC ...this is correct right?
= -hfe Ib (ro//Rc)/Rc

Ai =( -hfe/ hie)(ro//Rc)/Rc
= -93.053

Is all these working step correct?
 
Last edited:
You have used a factor hfe in some places where strictly the proper factor should be (hfe+1). For example you have:

Hie = Hfe re

but it should actually be Hie = (Hfe+1) re

Other than this, which leads to a very small error in some calculations (an error which is negligible if hfe is large), your answers are correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Check your re. Do you have the correct formula?

Not sure if Zo is meant to include C1 or not. Same for Zin and C2, come to think of it.

EDIT: actually, this circuit is saturated: the collector current computes to 100*(9.3V/390K) = 2.3846 mA which x 4.3K = 10.25V which exceeds the collector supply.
 
Last edited:
rude man said:
EDIT: actually, this circuit is saturated: the collector current computes to 100*(9.3V/390K) = 2.3846 mA which x 4.3K = 10.25V which exceeds the collector supply.

yeah i, but it still asking for amplification...

and about the re, do u mean the Ebers–Moll equation? Well, i still don't know how to use it yet, so i wil syick with the 26mv/ic approximation first.
 
null void said:
yeah i, but it still asking for amplification...

Amplification is zero.

You might have the right formula for re after all, I don't know your model.
 
rude man, were you referring to the fact that the usual formula for re is re = 26m V / IE rather than re = 26mV / IC?

Of course, if hfe is large, the difference is usually negligible, and somewhat variable since different people choose different values for the thermal voltage; sometimes 26 mV, sometimes 25 mV, etc.
 
null void, tell your instructor that you noticed that the transistor is saturated, so you assumed that V1 is actually 12 volts! :biggrin:

Or to really impress the instructor, tell him you analyzed a slight variation in the circuit, namely that V2 is gone and R1 is connected from collector to base.
 
  • #10
The Electrician said:
rude man, were you referring to the fact that the usual formula for re is re = 26m V / IE rather than re = 26mV / IC?

Of course, if hfe is large, the difference is usually negligible, and somewhat variable since different people choose different values for the thermal voltage; sometimes 26 mV, sometimes 25 mV, etc.

No, I had in mind re = 26mV/ib but that was probably wrong. As I said, i didn't know the OP's model.

EDIT: 26 mV/ib is the input impedance to a decently-biased BJT (Vce between say 1V and 20V):

Ic = Is exp(Vbe/Vt)
∂Ic/∂Vbe = Is (1/Vt) exp(Vbe/Vt) = Ic/Vt
1/Zin = ∂Ib/∂Vbe by definition = (1/β) ∂Ic/∂Vbe = (1/β)(Ic/Vt)
Zin = Vt/(Ic/β) = Vt/Ib = 26mV/Ib
 
Last edited:
  • #11
The Electrician said:
Or to really impress the instructor, tell him you analyzed a slight variation in the circuit, namely that V2 is gone and R1 is connected from collector to base.

That would actually be a viable circuit! (the one with 12V Vcc is too dependent on beta).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #12
If i add a resistor at the emitter to the circuit and change the V1 and V2, is it possible that for the Vce to become negative value, is this also a case of saturation?
 
  • #13
null void said:
If i add a resistor at the emitter to the circuit and change the V1 and V2, is it possible that for the Vce to become negative value, is this also a case of saturation?
A negative value for VCE would mean the circuit bears no resemblance to an amplifier.

An emitter resistor would allow a more stable design, but choose a lower value for V2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
23K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K