ranjitnepal
- 6
- 0
Please explain me simply about twin paradox..
The discussion revolves around the twin paradox, a thought experiment in special relativity involving two twins, one of whom travels at high speed while the other remains stationary. Participants seek to clarify the implications of time dilation and the perception of time between the twins during the journey.
Participants generally agree that the twin paradox involves complex interactions of time perception and relativity, but there is no consensus on the simplest way to explain it or on the specifics of how each twin perceives the other's aging. Multiple competing views and interpretations remain present throughout the discussion.
Some participants express frustration over the need for more effort in formulating questions, indicating that the topic has been discussed extensively in the forum. There are references to specific diagrams and previous threads that may contain relevant information, but no definitive resolution is reached in this thread.
ranjitnepal said:Please explain me simply about twin paradox..
analyst5 said:Hey, I was also thinking about starting a similar thread, but since it's already started I'll ask a straight-forward question that must be regarded here, why does the traveling twin see the clocks on the Earth (the twin that stayed at home) move slower, while less proper time elapses for mih. Shouldn't he see the twin that stayed at Earth age faster, and not slowe?
Start with the concept of an Inertial Reference Frame (IRF), as system of spatial and time coordinates, that allow you to specify when and where each twin is. Then for any twin that is moving, time progresses more slowly compared to the Coordinate Time of the IRF, the faster he moves, the slower his time progresses. So if both twins start out together at rest in the IRF but then one of them moves away and comes back, the one that moved will have elapsed less time the the one that stayed put. Simple, isn't it?ranjitnepal said:Please explain me simply about twin paradox..
If you draw the motions of the twins in a diagram of an IRF, you can also draw in the light signals that depict what each one sees and your answers will be clear as a bell. I have already invited you in one of your other threads to specify a scenario and I will do all the work for you but you still have not taken me up on my offer. If it is just a simple twin scenario, you can do a search on my name for the word "diagram" and you will find lots that already depict the twin scenario and answer your questions. Please do that before asking for one that is only insignificantly different.analyst5 said:Hey, I was also thinking about starting a similar thread, but since it's already started I'll ask a straight-forward question that must be regarded here, why does the traveling twin see the clocks on the Earth (the twin that stayed at home) move slower, while less proper time elapses for mih. Shouldn't he see the twin that stayed at Earth age faster, and not slowe?
ghwellsjr said:If you draw the motions of the twins in a diagram of an IRF, you can also draw in the light signals that depict what each one sees and your answers will be clear as a bell. I have already invited you in one of your other threads to specify a scenario and I will do all the work for you but you still have not taken me up on my offer. If it is just a simple twin scenario, you can do a search on my name for the word "diagram" and you will find lots that already depict the twin scenario and answer your questions. Please do that before asking for one that is only insignificantly different.
But to answer your question: the traveling twin will see the Earth twin age more slowly than himself on the outbound portion of his trip but more quickly on the inbound portion and it is the sum of the two that ends up with the traveling twin seeing the Earth twin age more for the entire trip. Haven't we gone over this before in one of your threads, including Durant's threads that I linked to?