Understanding the Vector Spaces in Berry's Geometrical Phase Paper

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the complexities of understanding Berry's 1984 paper on geometrical phases, particularly the interpretation of equation (6) involving bra-ket notation. Participants clarify that the expression results in a complex 3-vector, which is integrated over space to yield a scalar quantity. The confusion arises from the integration of a vector quantity within the bra-ket framework, leading to discussions about the nature of inner products and the role of the gradient operator in this context. The conversation emphasizes the need for a solid grasp of inner product definitions and the implications of parameter dependence in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, particularly gradient operators
  • Knowledge of Berry's phase and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of Hamiltonians and eigenstates in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Berry's phase in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of bra-ket notation
  • Explore vector calculus applications in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of parameter dependence in quantum state evolution
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics and geometrical phases.

  • #31
Syrus said:
It seems the notion I was lacking was that nabla acting on a ket vector in Hilbert space yields another vector in hilbert space (I hope).

Yes it does. Think about the partial derivative:
<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial R_i} \, \vert n(\mathbf{R}) \rangle \equiv \lim_{t \rightarrow 0} \frac{\vert n(R_1, \ldots, R_i + t, \ldots, R_n) \rangle - \vert n(R_1, \ldots, R_i, \ldots, R_n) \rangle}{t}<br />
Since the expression in the limit is always a linear combination of two kets, it must be a ket (that is what is meant by the Hilbert space being a linear space). Thus, every partial derivative is a ket. You may treat these partial derivatives as COVARIANT components of a gradient in some n dimensional metric space. This metric space may be curved, depending on the nature of the parameters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Syrus said:
It seems the notion I was lacking was that nabla acting on a ket vector in Hilbert space yields another vector in hilbert space (I hope).

No, it yields a vector of hilbert space vectors. You have to understand that there are two vector spaces here, one for states, one for parameters.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K