Understanding the Vector Spaces in Berry's Geometrical Phase Paper

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the vector spaces and mathematical expressions presented in Berry's 1984 paper on geometrical phases, particularly focusing on the bra-ket notation and its implications in the context of vector quantities and integration in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the interpretation of a bra-ket expression involving a complex conjugate state and a derivative operator, questioning how it results in another vector.
  • Another participant suggests that the notation may be misleading and proposes an alternative representation for clarity.
  • Some participants clarify that the operator \nabla _\mathbf{R} is a vector operator, leading to a 3-vector result, and discuss the implications of this in the context of integration.
  • A participant raises a question about the nature of the integration process, speculating whether it constitutes a non-standard bra-ket integration.
  • There are discussions about the inner product and how it relates to the integration of vector quantities, with some participants asserting that the result yields a vector of complex numbers.
  • One participant provides a detailed example involving a Hamiltonian in a magnetic field, illustrating the dependence of eigenstates on parameters and the calculation of integrals in Berry's phase context.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the definition of the parameter vector and its components, leading to further elaboration on the relationship between parameters and the Hamiltonian.
  • There is a discussion about the time dependence of the parameter vector in Berry's approach, with participants confirming this aspect.
  • One participant questions how the nabla operator interacts with vector-based quantities, expressing familiarity with its action on scalar functions but seeking further understanding.
  • A later reply provides an example involving a fermion in a magnetic field, illustrating the relationship between parameters and eigenvector solutions in quantum mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement, with some clarifying points and others expressing confusion or differing interpretations of the mathematical expressions and their implications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise nature of the integration and the interpretation of the bra-ket notation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential limitations in their understanding of the bra-ket formalism and its application in the context of Berry's geometrical phase, highlighting the complexity of integrating vector quantities and the nuances of quantum mechanical notation.

  • #31
Syrus said:
It seems the notion I was lacking was that nabla acting on a ket vector in Hilbert space yields another vector in hilbert space (I hope).

Yes it does. Think about the partial derivative:
<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial R_i} \, \vert n(\mathbf{R}) \rangle \equiv \lim_{t \rightarrow 0} \frac{\vert n(R_1, \ldots, R_i + t, \ldots, R_n) \rangle - \vert n(R_1, \ldots, R_i, \ldots, R_n) \rangle}{t}<br />
Since the expression in the limit is always a linear combination of two kets, it must be a ket (that is what is meant by the Hilbert space being a linear space). Thus, every partial derivative is a ket. You may treat these partial derivatives as COVARIANT components of a gradient in some n dimensional metric space. This metric space may be curved, depending on the nature of the parameters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Syrus said:
It seems the notion I was lacking was that nabla acting on a ket vector in Hilbert space yields another vector in hilbert space (I hope).

No, it yields a vector of hilbert space vectors. You have to understand that there are two vector spaces here, one for states, one for parameters.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K