Chemistry Understanding thermodynamics of a stretched rubber band

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the thermodynamics of a stretched rubber band, focusing on the internal energy function U as a function of temperature, length, and particle number. The first law of thermodynamics is applied, revealing that when stretching the rubber band, the work done is positive, leading to an increase in internal energy. The solution manual asserts that for thermal stability, the heat capacity at constant length, C_L, must be positive, which implies that temperature must also increase when the rubber band is stretched. The confusion arises regarding the relationship between changes in internal energy and temperature when the length is variable, particularly in how this applies uniquely to rubber bands compared to other solids. The discussion highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the specific properties of rubber bands in thermodynamic contexts.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
The thermodynamics of a rubber band are given by the relation

$$dU=TdS+fdL+\mu dN$$

The force is defined in such a way that it is positive when the rubber band is stretched.
Relevant Equations
If we pull the rubber band in thermal isolation (ie no heat exchange), how does the temperature of the rubber band change?

You might find it useful to develop an expression for the heat capacity at constant length, ##C_L##. Note that ##C_L>0##.
Consider the function ##U=U(T,L,N)##.

$$dU=\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right )_{L,N} dT+\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial L}\right )_{T,N} dL+\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial N}\right )_{T,L} dN$$

and define

$$C_L\equiv\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right )_{L,N}$$

By the 1st law we have

$$dU=dQ+dW=fdL>0$$

since ##dQ=0## by assumption, ##dW=fdL##, and for stretching ##f>0## and ##dL>0##.

I got this far.

Here is what the solution manual says

For the sake of thermal stability of materials, however, we know that heat capacities have to be larger than zero. The only possibility for ##C_L=(\partial U/\partial T)_{L,N}## to satisfy this condition is when ##dT>0## as well. That is, the temperature has to increase.

I do not understand this conclusion.

"Thermal stability" is lost on me, and has not been talked about in my course.

The result seems to be a purely mathematical one.

$$\left (\frac{\partial T}{\partial U}\right )_{L,N}=\frac{1}{C_L}$$

Sure, we have a positive change in ##U##. But the heat capacity above is at constant length and we are changing the length. Why can we conclude from the above expression that ##dT>0## based on ##dU>0## when ##L## is changing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think something is missing here which allows to estimate partial S/partial L|_T.
 
Specifically, in which respect is a rubber band special as compared with any other solid? Also stretching an ordinary solid requires work and solids C_L is positive.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top