Understanding Torque for car rollover

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Torque
Click For Summary
Understanding torque in the context of car rollover involves recognizing that torque is calculated using the vector cross product of the radius vector and the force vector. The dashed lines in the provided figure represent distances relevant to the forces acting on the car, clarifying how to analyze the situation. When calculating the critical point of rollover, it is sufficient to assume the normal force on one side of the tires is zero, without needing to assume the tires have left the ground. The simplified approach in some texts uses the scalar form of torque, which can overlook the direction of the torque vector but is adequate for this analysis. Properly analyzing these forces and distances is essential for determining the speed at which a car can navigate a turn without rolling over.
Maxo
Messages
160
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


image.jpg


Homework Equations


\vec{\tau} = \vec{F}\vec{l}

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand this problem except for the part that involves Torque.
I would like some help in understanding how the Torque is calculated in this problem. Please look at Figure 9.13 c). I know the axis of rotation is perpendicular to the page, and that the rotation can be either clockwise or counterclockwise around this axis. I also see that the forces FN and fs are the forces which can cause this rotation. However I don't understand the general idea in figuring out how those dashed lines should be placed. Can someone please give me some suggestions on the general idea of how to analyze this kind of situation? I also don't know what the black dashed line in the picture actually represents?

Another question for this particular problem, I wonder how one would come up with the idea of looking at the car with only one side of the wheels in the ground? If one side of the cars wheels are already above ground, I would say the car already is going too fast. And the question was how fast it can go WITHOUT rolling over. I mean I wouldn't want to be in a car where one side of the wheels have already started to lift from the ground. But apparently one has to assume that in order to calculate this problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maxo;4760024[h2 said:
Homework Equations[/h2]
\vec{\tau} = \vec{F}\vec{l}
Your difficulties start with this equation. The correct definition of torque is
\vec\tau = \vec r \times \vec F
with ##\times## being the vector cross product, ##\vec F## being the force, and ##\vec r## being the radius vector from the point about which the torque is being calculated to the (effective) point of application of the force. Remember that the vector cross product is not commutative.
 
The dashed lines only clarify what the distances refer to. They are not forces etc.
As tms says, you want the cross product of the displacement vector and the force vector. Since, in this case, there are only right angles involved, it's pretty easy. You can use the scalar form, Fd, where d is the distance from the axis to the line of action of the force.
For the critical point at which there is a danger of rolling, you can take the normal force on the tyres on one side to be zero. You don't need to suppose they have actually left the ground. Once they do leave the ground the torque imbalance gets worse, and the car will roll.
 
I know Torque is actually a cross product, in my book they use a simplified(?) version where the component of the length l that is perpendicular to both the force and to the rotatonal axis is measured, thence it becomes a normal product instead of cross product. This also means the direction of the Torque vector is lost, but that doesn't seem to matter so much here.
 
Maxo said:
I know Torque is actually a cross product, in my book they use a simplified(?) version where the component of the length l that is perpendicular to both the force and to the rotatonal axis is measured, thence it becomes a normal product instead of cross product. This also means the direction of the Torque vector is lost, but that doesn't seem to matter so much here.
So is there some assistance you still need?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
811
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K