Understanding Vector Rotation and Derivation of Angular Velocity Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter sherlockjones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotating Vectors
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
sherlockjones
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Lets say we have a vector [tex]\vec{A}(t)[/tex] with a constant magnitude [tex]A[/tex]. Thus [tex]\vec{A}(t)[/tex] can only change in direction (rotation). We know that [tex]\frac{d\vec{A}}{dt}[/tex] is always perpendicular to [tex]\vec{A}[/tex]. This is where I become stuck:

[tex]\Delta \vec{A} = \vec{A}(t+\Delta t)-\vec{A}(t)[/tex]
[tex]|\Delta \vec{A}| = 2A\sin\frac{\Delta \theta}{2}[/tex].

How do we get the trigonometric expression on the right in the second equation? It looks like some type of half/double angle formula. Eventually we are supposed to get [tex]\vec{A}\frac{d\theta}{dt}[/tex] or the angular velocity of [tex]\vec{A}[/tex]


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting! I was sure that couldn't possibly be correct when I started calculating it!

First, what you have is for
[tex]\Delta \vec{A} = \vec{A}(\theta+\Delta \theta)-\vec{A}(\theta)[/tex]
that is, with [itex]\theta[/itex] not t. And, of course, there is a typo in the second equation: you mean [itex]|\vec{A}|[/itex], not just [itex]A[/itex].

Any plane vector of constant length r can be written [itex]\vec{A}= rcos(\theta)\vec{i}+ rsin(\theta)\vec{j}[/itex]. Then
[itex]\vec{A(\theta+ \Delta\theta)}- \vec{A(\theta)}= r((cos(\theta+ \Delta\theta)- cos(\theta))\vec{i}+ (sin(\theta+ \Delta\theta)- sin(\theta))\vec{j})[/itex]
You can use [itex]cos(a+ b)= cos(a)cos(b)- sin(a)sin(b)[/itex] and [itex]sin(a+b)= sin(a)cos(b)+ cos(a)sin(b)[/itex] to expand those. I won't do all of the calculations here (writing all of that in LaTex would be more tedious than the calculations!) but squaring each those and summing reduces to [itex]2- 2cos(\Delta\theta)[/itex]. I was surprised when I saw that the terms involving only [itex]\theta[/itex] rather than [itex]/Delta/theta[/itex] cancel out! Of course, the square root of that does give the half angle formula.
 
it was actually the change in [tex]\vec{A}[/tex] in the time interval [tex]t[/tex] to [tex]t + \Delta t[/tex]. So wouldn't it be: [tex]\Delta \vec{A} = \vec{A}(t+\Delta t)-\vec{A}(t)[/tex]?