Understanding Vector Rotation and Derivation of Angular Velocity Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter sherlockjones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotating Vectors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the angular velocity formula from the vector rotation of a constant magnitude vector \(\vec{A}(t)\). It establishes that the change in vector \(\Delta \vec{A}\) is calculated using the expression \(|\Delta \vec{A}| = 2A\sin\frac{\Delta \theta}{2}\), which is derived from the half-angle formula. The conversation clarifies that the correct notation involves using \(\theta\) instead of \(t\) for angular calculations. The final goal is to express angular velocity as \(\vec{A}\frac{d\theta}{dt}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities, particularly the half-angle formula
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically derivatives and limits
  • Basic concepts of angular motion and velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular velocity in rotational dynamics
  • Learn about the application of trigonometric identities in vector calculus
  • Explore the relationship between angular displacement and linear displacement
  • Investigate the implications of constant magnitude vectors in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mathematicians, and engineers interested in vector calculus, rotational dynamics, and angular motion principles.

sherlockjones
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Lets say we have a vector [tex]\vec{A}(t)[/tex] with a constant magnitude [tex]A[/tex]. Thus [tex]\vec{A}(t)[/tex] can only change in direction (rotation). We know that [tex]\frac{d\vec{A}}{dt}[/tex] is always perpendicular to [tex]\vec{A}[/tex]. This is where I become stuck:

[tex]\Delta \vec{A} = \vec{A}(t+\Delta t)-\vec{A}(t)[/tex]
[tex]|\Delta \vec{A}| = 2A\sin\frac{\Delta \theta}{2}[/tex].

How do we get the trigonometric expression on the right in the second equation? It looks like some type of half/double angle formula. Eventually we are supposed to get [tex]\vec{A}\frac{d\theta}{dt}[/tex] or the angular velocity of [tex]\vec{A}[/tex]


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting! I was sure that couldn't possibly be correct when I started calculating it!

First, what you have is for
[tex]\Delta \vec{A} = \vec{A}(\theta+\Delta \theta)-\vec{A}(\theta)[/tex]
that is, with [itex]\theta[/itex] not t. And, of course, there is a typo in the second equation: you mean [itex]|\vec{A}|[/itex], not just [itex]A[/itex].

Any plane vector of constant length r can be written [itex]\vec{A}= rcos(\theta)\vec{i}+ rsin(\theta)\vec{j}[/itex]. Then
[itex]\vec{A(\theta+ \Delta\theta)}- \vec{A(\theta)}= r((cos(\theta+ \Delta\theta)- cos(\theta))\vec{i}+ (sin(\theta+ \Delta\theta)- sin(\theta))\vec{j})[/itex]
You can use [itex]cos(a+ b)= cos(a)cos(b)- sin(a)sin(b)[/itex] and [itex]sin(a+b)= sin(a)cos(b)+ cos(a)sin(b)[/itex] to expand those. I won't do all of the calculations here (writing all of that in LaTex would be more tedious than the calculations!) but squaring each those and summing reduces to [itex]2- 2cos(\Delta\theta)[/itex]. I was surprised when I saw that the terms involving only [itex]\theta[/itex] rather than [itex]/Delta/theta[/itex] cancel out! Of course, the square root of that does give the half angle formula.
 
it was actually the change in [tex]\vec{A}[/tex] in the time interval [tex]t[/tex] to [tex]t + \Delta t[/tex]. So wouldn't it be: [tex]\Delta \vec{A} = \vec{A}(t+\Delta t)-\vec{A}(t)[/tex]?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
926
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K