Understanding Work: A High Schooler's Guide

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter manujnaik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of work in physics, specifically addressing why work is considered a scalar quantity despite being derived from vector quantities such as force and displacement. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of work, its dependence on angles, and the implications of vector operations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about how work can be scalar, questioning whether the dependence on force direction implies it should be a vector.
  • One participant clarifies that the formula W=FSCosX involves a dot product, which results in a scalar, as it measures the projection of one vector onto another.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the dot product of two vectors yields a scalar, reinforcing the idea that work, derived from this product, is also scalar.
  • A participant introduces the concept of the scalar product and illustrates it with an analogy involving moving an object, suggesting that energy expenditure remains constant regardless of direction.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the dot product and its interpretation, with some participants attempting to clarify the mathematical reasoning behind why work is scalar.
  • One participant seeks to confirm whether the original question about work being scalar has been adequately addressed, indicating ongoing uncertainty.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical reasoning that leads to work being a scalar quantity, particularly through the dot product. However, there remains some confusion and differing interpretations regarding the implications of direction and the nature of the question itself.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of vector and scalar quantities, particularly in the context of work and energy. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding and interpretation of the underlying physics concepts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for high school students studying physics, particularly those grappling with the concepts of work, energy, and vector mathematics.

manujnaik
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm a bit confused on how 'work' can be scalar. I understand that W=FSCosX where X is the angle between the point of application of force and the object. So if the Work depends upon the angle, shouldn't that mean it depends on direction of force applied making it a vector? I'm a high school student so please don't kill me because I'm honestly confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In what direction does work point?
 
W=FSCosX

You are nearly there, but look more closely at your formula.

A vector, multiplied by a number is still a vector.

cosX is a number so any single vector, multiplied by cosX is a vector.

But in your formula both F and S are vectors.

So you have two vectors multiplied together and their product multiplied by cosx.

Whenever you have this situation the result is a scalar.
 
manujnaik said:
Hi, I'm a bit confused on how 'work' can be scalar.

Force is a vector (3D). The "difference" from point A to B can be called a vector (d=(x1,y1,z1)-(x2,y2,z2)). Between, there is a so called scalar product. Meaning:
Fx * dx + Fy * dy + Fz * dz = W (Work). Do you understand that the scalar product between vectors is a number and in this case: Work is scalar?
If not, try in mind to move a body where you live. Take the body and have a nice trip to Regensburg in Germany. Move the body there (cheaper to do it in your neighboorship but nevertheless a nice journey). The energy you will spend is the same. And the direction is not important, there is no east or west or north or south energy.


Jens
 
F.Scos x=W
S is displacement i.e. a vector quantity
i.e.
Scosx is also a vector
F is force i.e. a vector
u must remember that the dot product of two vectors is scalar
thus W=F.S cosx is a scalar quantity
 
/
_

if you look at the two lines above, the dot product is like asking how much the top line lays over the bottom line. As you change the angle between the two lines, you will have different lengths of overlap (the "projection" it's called, since you're essentially measuring the length of the shadow the top line casts on the bottom line). No direction required to answer that question.
 
yeah absolutrly pythagorean
 
shubhxxx said:
F.Scos x=W
S is displacement i.e. a vector quantity
i.e.
Scosx is also a vector
F is force i.e. a vector
u must remember that the dot product of two vectors is scalar
thus W=F.S cosx is a scalar quantity

Okay so the product of two vectors is scalar and thus Work is scalar. Am I right?
 
Not all products; the dot product, often called the scalar product.
 
  • #10
manujnaik said:
Hi, I'm a bit confused on how 'work' can be scalar. I understand that W=FSCosX where X is the angle between the point of application of force and the object. So if the Work depends upon the angle, shouldn't that mean it depends on direction of force applied making it a vector? I'm a high school student so please don't kill me because I'm honestly confused.

Can I check that the right question was (already well) answered?

Are you asking why work (i.e. *energy*) is a scalar, or are you asking why 'FSCosX' is a scalar?
 
  • #11
Andy Resnick said:
Can I check that the right question was (already well) answered?

Are you asking why work (i.e. *energy*) is a scalar, or are you asking why 'FSCosX' is a scalar?

I am asking why Work is scalar but I think I understand it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K