1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Unif. conv. of fx=Σc_n*x^n on |x|<h implies unif. conv. on |x|<=h?

  1. Dec 1, 2007 #1
    [SOLVED] unif. conv. of fx=Σc_n*x^n on |x|<h implies unif. conv. on |x|<=h???

    my whole question is on the title..uniform convergence of power series..

    The answer is yes..how can I prove that? help me lol

    and I`d like to know..the existence of limit..

    [1 3 5 ''' (2n-1)]/[2 4 6 ''' (2n)] -> ???? as n goes infinity..

    (sorry for my bad Eng..)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 1, 2007 #2

    EnumaElish

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Suppose there is no unif. conv. on the closure (|x| < h). What does that imply about the behavior of the function as |x| ---> h (versus at |x| = h)?
     
  4. Dec 1, 2007 #3
    I liked this problem because I hadn't thought about it before and my initial thought was to apply Abel's theorem, but it turned out not to be the thing to do here.


    Fact 1) Suppose f_n -> f uniformly on [a,b), and f_n(b) -> f(b).
    prove: f_n -> f uniformly on [a,b].


    Fact 2) If f_n is a sequence of continuous functions on [a,b] that converges
    uniformly to f(x) on [a,b), then lim f_n(b) exists.

    proof:

    Fix e > 0.
    By uniform convergence, choose N such that such that |f_n(x)-f_m(x)| < e for n,m > N, x in [a,b).
    By continuity, |f_n(b)-f_m(b)| = lim |f_n(x)-f_m(x)| <= e.
    Hence f_n(b) is Cauchy, thus converges.


    Applying 1),2) above, you get:

    If f_n is a sequence of continuous functions on [a,b] such that f_n -> f(x) uniformly on [a,b),
    then f_n -> f(x) uniformly on [a,b]. (Where in the hypothesis, it is not assumed lim f_n(b) exists.)

    (*note: f(b) is defined to be lim f_n(b), in the conclusion of the proof.)
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2007
  5. Dec 1, 2007 #4
    thx much..:)

    but after showing that lim f_n(b) exists(f_n Cauchy seq. at x=b)..

    isn`t it necessary to show that the limit tends to f(b)=Σc_n b^n??

    so |f_n(b)-f(b)| -> 0 as n-> infinity..???
     
  6. Dec 2, 2007 #5
    You have [tex]f_n(b) = \sum_{i=0}^n c_i b^i[/tex] is a Cauchy sequence. By definition, [tex]\sum_{i=0}^\infty c_i b^i[/tex] is the limit of this sequence. So no, there's nothing to show.

    In the above proof, I didn't assume lim f_n(b) existed. Once I showed it existed, of course we have to define f(b) = lim f_n(b). But in the case of power series, that is precisely what the definition of f(x) is.
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2007
  7. Dec 6, 2007 #6
    Got it~! thx very much for saving me!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Unif. conv. of fx=Σc_n*x^n on |x|&lt;h implies unif. conv. on |x|&lt;=h?
Loading...