Uniform Charge Density on a Plastic Sheet

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the charge-per-area (sigma) on a large horizontal plastic sheet with a uniform charge density, which supports an object with mass M and charge Q in equilibrium. The user initially applies the equation E = sigma / (2*epsilon), where epsilon represents the permittivity of free space, but questions the necessity of the factor of 2. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding equilibrium conditions and the relationship between electric field, charge, and mass, specifically through the equation a = qE/m. Ultimately, the user concludes that equilibrium is key to solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge density
  • Familiarity with the concept of equilibrium in physics
  • Knowledge of the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration
  • Basic grasp of the permittivity of free space (epsilon)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the equation E = sigma / (2*epsilon)
  • Explore the principles of electrostatics related to uniform charge distributions
  • Learn about the conditions for equilibrium in electrostatic systems
  • Investigate the implications of the relationship a = qE/m in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics and equilibrium conditions, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of charge distributions and electric fields.

Solidification
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been struggling over this the entire weekend and am about to rip my hair out.

Suppose we have some object with a mass M and a charge Q. It floats above the center of a large horizontal plastic sheet with a uniform charge density on its surface. What is the charge-per-area (sigma) on the plastic sheet?

Every bit of "help" I've found all dealt with spheres and two plates with some distance between each other, or some point located some given distance away from a plane, etc. I don't know where to start with this. I attempted the E = sigma / (2*epsilon), where epsilon is the permittivity of free space (I apologize; I do not understand how to input Greek letters and mathematical signs on forums).

I think that's right, but the 2 might be unnecessary. From there, I knew I had to replace E with something else. That I'm not sure of because I don't know of anything that relates a field of Energy with mass, except that a = qE/m. Since it is hovering, though, I'd suspect a = 0, so that's useless to me. My force equations seem useless because they've all required some radius, but there's no specification.

I'm more interested on just where to start (one step beyond the E = sigma / (2*epsilon), assuming that's even right to begin with). Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation e= \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} is valid only when the sheet is very large, comparing to the distance betwwen the sheet and the object. In this case, I think using this is logical.

a = \frac{qE}{m} what is this acceleration mean? It's not the object's resultant acceleration

I think equillibrium can solve this problem.
 
You were absolutely right. Thank you. I had thought the acceleration WAS the resultant acceleration. It certainly implies that in my physics books.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K