Uniform Circular Motion and Centripetal Acceleration

[Nathanael]

In introductory physics books (or at least mine) it limits the equation a_c=\frac{v^2}{r} to the sitaution where the speed around the circular path is constant. It enforces the idea that the speed is CONSTANT.

But wouldn't the equation also apply to non-constant speeds? (a_c would just change from being a constant to being a function of the speed)

It would be very counter-intuitive to me if this equation did not apply to variable speeds (because why does this instant in time care about the speed of the next instant in time?)


So my question is, can you also use this equation for variable speeds?

 

[UltrafastPED]

Some parts of your question are dealt with here: http://www.sweethaven02.com/Science/PhysicsCalc/Ch0119.pdf

The machinery required to solve for the general case of centripetal acceleration for an object constrained to travel in a circle of constant radius, but with variable speed, is discussed ... you should be able to work through to the answer on your own from this point.

 

[Nathanael]

Some parts of your question are dealt with here: http://www.sweethaven02.com/Science/PhysicsCalc/Ch0119.pdf

Thank you.

 

[UltrafastPED]

And if you want to go further, learn the Frenet-Serret apparatus; usually taught as part of vector calculus - calc 3.

 

[Impulse]

why does this instant in time care about the speed of the next instant in time?

Is not the definition of acceleration the rate of change of velocity over time?

Is it possible to have instantaneous acceleration? A classic definition of \overline{a} = (v_f - v_i) / t would be undefined at t = 0.

 

[jbriggs444]

Is not the definition of acceleration the rate of change of velocity over time?

Is it possible to have instantaneous acceleration? A classic definition of \overline{a} = (v_f - v_i) / t would be undefined at t = 0.

The mathematical definition would be the limit (if one exists) of the average rate of change (v_f-v_i)/(t_f-t_i) as t_f approaches t_i without actually getting there.

That is to say that acceleration is the derivative of velocity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative

 

[AlephZero]

Your equation does give the centripetal component of the acceleration even when the speed is changing. But if the speed is changing, there is also a tangential component of the acceleration.

You will probably meet this later on if your course deals with objects moving in a vertical circle, where the speed is greater at the bottom of the circle than at the top.

 

[WannabeNewton]

...because why does this instant in time care about the speed of the next instant in time?

The following is a general remark about acceleration. Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity. You can't determine acceleration at a given instant of time by only knowing velocity at that instant of time. You need to know it in some open interval centered on that instant of time. This is part of the basic definition of a derivative.