Uniform Convergence of fn(x) for x in (1, infinity)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hamsterman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Limit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the uniform convergence of the sequence of functions \( f_n(x) = \frac{n}{x^n} \) for \( x \) in the interval \( (1, \infty) \). Participants explore the limit behavior of this sequence as \( n \) approaches infinity and the implications for uniform convergence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the limit \( \lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sup \left\{\frac{n}{x^n}:x\in\left( 1; \infty\right)\right\} \) approaches 0 for \( x > 1 \).
  • Others argue that for \( x = 1 + \frac{1}{n} \), the limit could potentially be \( +\infty \), raising questions about the conditions under which the limit equals 0.
  • A participant emphasizes that \( x \) should be treated as fixed and not as a function of \( n \), suggesting that this distinction is crucial for determining the limit.
  • Another participant discusses the need to analyze the convergence uniformly by checking the condition \( \forall\epsilon>0, \exists N,\forall n > N, \forall x: |f-f_n|(x) < \epsilon \).
  • There is a discussion about the difference between sequences of functions and sequences of points, with some participants expressing confusion over how to define \( x \) in relation to \( n \).
  • One participant notes that the limit \( f_n(1 + \frac{1}{n}) \) does not represent a pointwise limit, which raises further questions about uniform convergence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of the limit and the implications for uniform convergence. There is no consensus on whether the limit approaches 0 uniformly or under what conditions uniform convergence occurs.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of distinguishing between sequences of functions and sequences of points, as well as the implications of treating \( x \) as a fixed parameter versus a variable dependent on \( n \).

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for those studying uniform convergence in mathematical analysis, particularly in the context of sequences of functions and their limits.

hamsterman
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
What is the value of
\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sup \left\{\frac{n}{x^n}:x\in\left( 1; \infty\right)\right\}
It seems to be 0, but what if x = 1+\frac{1}{n}? In that case x^n = e and the above limit is then +\infty, isn't it? I have a feeling I'm somehow wrong, but if I'm not, for what x is the above limit equal to 0 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
function goes to 0 when x>1

thats the answer.
 
Sorry, my first post was wrong, this is the edit. I think that if you do that, then x = 1, and is no longer satisfying the bounds of being between 1 and infinity.
 
@EternityMech, would you elaborate? Is 1+\frac{1}{n} = 1? I'm sure it isn't because raising both sides to the power of n gives e = 1
 
hamsterman said:
@EternityMech, would you elaborate? Is 1+\frac{1}{n} = 1? I'm sure it isn't because raising both sides to the power of n gives e = 1

Yes I realized my error and changed my post.

EDIT: ooh and it looks like you realized that i realized my error and you also changed your post. well...thats good that this is all sorted out.
 
hamsterman said:
What is the value of
\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sup \left\{\frac{n}{x^n}:x\in\left( 1; \infty\right)\right\}
It seems to be 0, but what if x = 1+\frac{1}{n}? In that case x^n = e and the above limit is then +\infty, isn't it? I have a feeling I'm somehow wrong, but if I'm not, for what x is the above limit equal to 0 ?
its a lim sup of sequence of numbers or sequence of sets ? if numbers show me what are a1,a2,a3,...and if sets show what are X1,X2,X3,...
 
First of all, x is fixed. You can not replace it by a terms that depends on n, if you do, you change the sequence. What the sequence is completely determined by how n appears in it.

This is limsup so first you have to find supremum over m>n and then take the limit. I am assuming you are defining the supremum as follows (it may change but the general convention is this)

\sup_{m&gt;n} \left\{\frac{m}{x^m}:x\in\left( 1; \infty\right)\right\}

However in our case the terms approach to zero (divide n+1th element by the nth element and take the limit, you will see that it is less than 1 so using theorems from calculus you can say that the limit exists and is zero). So when your sequence has a limit, liminf and limsup are equal to it and to each other (for instance on the contrary consider a sequence of points which converge to points on a sine graph, they do not have a limit but their limsup and liminf is 1 and -1). Thus the answer is zero.

More explicitly you can show that after a certain value of n (when we pass over the maximum of \frac{m}{x^m}) then
sup_{m&gt;n} \frac{m}{x^m} = \frac{n+1}{x^{n+1}} and so taking the limit gives you the result.
 
Last edited:
I guess I should add some context. I'm given f_n(x)=\frac{n}{x^n}. I need to analyze the convergence of this sequence of functions for all x &gt; 1. First I see that f(x) = \lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty} \frac{n}{x^n} = 0. I then need to check whether \forall\epsilon&gt;0, \exists N,\forall n &gt; N, \forall x: |f-f_n|(x) &lt; \epsilon to know if the convergence is uniform. I do that using the expression in my first post. I'm sure that x can be a function of n because \forall x goes after \exists N.

@vrmuth, I'm not sure how to define it. I guess it's a set of functions of n. Either way, the set is not discrete.
 
well you should definitely distinguish between sequences of functions and sequences of points :) your first post looks more like a limit of sequence of points rather than functions. Still it is a bit strange to define x interms of n since it is just a free parameter no?

The limit fn(1+n) as n goes to infinity is not a point-wise limit but you just select the value of each fn at the point 1+n and look whether if that has a limit. I can't see what that would have to do with this question since we want to look at pointwise limits or uniform limit.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
What I can't distinguish between is functions, numbers and sets. A function because it has an argument n, a number if n is a constant and a set if n is any natural number.

If limit fn(1+1/n) is not a pointwise limit, I assume that this sequence does not converge uniformly. In that case, my question is, for what x does it converge uniformly?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K