Uniform, semicircular rod of radius R and mass m in the center

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a uniform, semicircular rod of radius R and mass M, with a small mass m positioned at the center. The original poster is tasked with finding the gravitational force exerted on mass m by the rod and the potential energy of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up integrals to calculate the gravitational force and potential energy, using linear density and differential mass elements. Some participants question the correctness of the integrals and the presence of redundant differentials. Others suggest using symmetry arguments to simplify the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's approach, providing feedback on the setup of the integrals and discussing potential errors. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the treatment of differentials and the integration process. Multiple interpretations of the integrals are being explored, particularly regarding their components.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the correct formulation of the gravitational force and potential energy integrals, as well as the treatment of vector components. The discussion highlights the importance of careful notation and understanding of differential calculus in the context of this problem.

aquance
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Pic: http://i.imgur.com/Ny4YAKf.jpg

Rod has radius R, and mass M. Small mass has mass m.

I have to find gravitational force exerted on mass m by rod and potential energy of the whole thing.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So my idea is that soluton is 2 integrals from 0 to pi/2 of gravitational force of small masses dM, Ill use linear density p.

p = \frac{M}{\pi R}
dM = ds p
Rd\alpha = ds
F= \frac{GdM}{R^2}\frac{\vec{r}}{r}
\vec{r} = R(cos\alpha,sin\alpha)
2\int\limits_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{GdM}{R^2} (cos\alpha,sin\alpha) d\alpha

Now substitute first 3 equations so I get

2\int\limits_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{GMd\alpha }{\pi R^2} (cos\alpha,sin\alpha) d\alpha
2\frac{GM}{\pi R^{2}} \int\limits_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} d\alpha (cos\alpha,sin\alpha) d\alpha


And I don't know what to do with it. I am also not sure about how to calculate the total potential energy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those integrals look easy to evaluate for both components. There is a sign error, however, one component has a negative sign in one of the integrals. Why did you split that at all? You can just integrate from 0 to pi.
You can get one of the components with a symmetry argument, by the way.

I am also not sure about how to calculate the total potential energy
You can use a similar integral, just for the potential instead of the force.
 
mfb said:
Those integrals look easy to evaluate for both components. There is a sign error, however, one component has a negative sign in one of the integrals. Why did you split that at all? You can just integrate from 0 to pi.
You can get one of the components with a symmetry argument, by the way.

You can use a similar integral, just for the potential instead of the force.


Well it's cool that they look easy to evaluate, but I don't know how to do that and I was expecting help ;d Is my work up to the last one correct?

Sign error? I am not sure where

Idk why I split them, It doesn't matter too much I guess.
 
1st: Use equations to solve problems. Tip: if the symbol "=" is not present, it ain't an equation.
2nd: Your integrals have two differential "dα" factors. All you need is one of them. The other one is redundant and makes your equation look wrong.
3rd: Don't you know how to integrate a cosine and/or sine function(s)? That's like the second integral people learn, after learning to integrate polynomials.
 
1. Yeah, you can add = after each integral in my op then.
2. Yeah, but I somehow got 2 da factors - how to get rid of it, because I don't think I can just cross it?
3. I do how to integrate cosine and sine function, but I don't know how to integrate a vector with 2 da.
 
1. My point is that you made hard for me to figure out what you're calculating
2. You made a mistake in one of your steps introducing a differential that wasn't there. I think it happened when you substituted the expression for r.
3. There ain't two dα. There is only one. The other one is a mistake.

added by EDIT: differentials are nilpotent. that means that the product of two differentials vanishes. If that ever happens, you know you've made a mistake somewhere. Don't confuse that with multiple integration in which case you're supposed to have several differential factors. That's not the case here. You're calculating a single integral.
 
Last edited:
dauto said:
1. My point is that you made hard for me to figure out what you're calculating
2. You made a mistake in one of your steps introducing a differential that wasn't there. I think it happened what you substituted the expression for r.
3. There ain't two dα. There is only one. The other one is a mistake.

So for 2, ill explain what I do since I don't know where did second wrong da come from...

I get formula for linear density - all mass divided by all length

p = \frac{M}{\pi R}

I get formula for infinite small mass with small length - it is its length times linear density

dM = ds p

I get formula for small length, as a function of α

ds = rdα

Now I start with equation number 2 and put there the other two so

dM = ds p = rdα*p = rdα * \frac{M}{\pi R} = \frac{Mdα}{\pi}

So now I have dM and want to calculate integral of infinite small gravitational forces from 0 to π/2. We also know that vector r with direction can be written as \vec{r} = R(cosα, sinα)

So that integral - \int\limits_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{GdM}{r^2} \frac{\vec{r}}{r} ds = \int\limits_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{G\frac{Mdα}{\pi}}{r^2} \frac{\vec{r}}{r} r dα = \frac{GM}{\pi} \int\limits_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{dα \vec{r}}{r^2} dα

and yeah, I don't know where did I make a mistake
 
Your starting differential is ##d\vec F = \frac{GmdM}{r^2} \frac{\vec{r}}{r}##, not ##d\vec F = \frac{GmdM}{r^2} \frac{\vec{r}}{r} ds##.
 
Aaaah yes, thanks. Btw is it GmdM or GdM?

So I have:

\frac{GmM}{\pi*r^{2}} \int (cosa,sina) da

What can I do with this integral? Do I treat it as integral cosa da + integral sina da or something?
 
  • #10
No, you don't add the integrals. They are separate components. The result of the integration is a vector with two components. Each component is a separate integral.
 
  • #11
Ok, so I take it that you just put the integral into the vector so you have (integral of cos, integral of sin)? If so then the result is vector (1,1) which.. does it make sense? It means that equal force vector is (\frac{2GmM}{\pi*r^2}, \frac{2GmM}{\pi*r^2})

Also please answer question about wheter should it be GmM/.. or GM/...
 
  • #12
Isn't it that all forces on x-axis are 0?
 
  • #13
aquance said:
Ok, so I take it that you just put the integral into the vector so you have (integral of cos, integral of sin)? If so then the result is vector (1,1) which.. does it make sense? It means that equal force vector is (\frac{2GmM}{\pi*r^2}, \frac{2GmM}{\pi*r^2})

Also please answer question about wheter should it be GmM/.. or GM/...

No, (1,1) isn't right. What are the limits of the integral?
 
  • #14
If you're calculating the force than its GmM/r2, isn't it?
 
  • #15
Ah okay I dun goofed, with limits of 0 to pi it's actually (0,2) and so we get (0,\frac{2GmM}{\pi*r^{2}}) Which appears to be correcT?
 
  • #16
That seems right.
 
  • #17
What about potential energy? Is it the same integrals but with just formula -GmM/r instead of what I used here?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K