Uniqueness and Existence Theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differential equation t2y'' - 2ty' + 2y = 0, which has general solutions of the form y = C(t) + D(t2), where C and D are constants. Despite the continuity of the coefficients t2, -2t, and 2, the initial conditions y(0) = 1 and y'(0) = 1 lead to the conclusion that no solutions exist at t = 0. This situation does not contradict the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem because the theorem requires continuity and Lipschitz conditions in a neighborhood around the initial point, which fails at t = 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem for differential equations
  • Familiarity with linear homogeneous differential equations
  • Knowledge of Lipschitz continuity and its implications
  • Ability to convert higher-order differential equations into first-order systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem in detail, focusing on its conditions
  • Learn about Lipschitz continuity and its role in differential equations
  • Explore methods for converting higher-order differential equations to first-order systems
  • Investigate the implications of discontinuities in differential equations at specific points
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying differential equations, educators teaching advanced calculus, and researchers exploring the properties of linear differential equations.

bhsmith
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


for the differential equation

t^2y''-2ty'+2y=0 with the general solutions y=C(t) + D(t^2) where C and D are constants. given the inital solution y(0)=1 and y'(0)=1 there are no solutions that exist. Why does this not contradict the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem?





The Attempt at a Solution



This theorem says that all linear, homogeneous equations have a solution. Since t^2, -2t and 2 are all continuous I don't understand why there is no solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, there's your problem: the "existence and uniqueness theorem" says nothing of the sort!

It says "If there exist a neighborhood of (t_0, y_0) such that f(t,y) is continuous in the neighborhood and f is "Lipschitz in y" in the neighborhood (that, essentially means that |f(t, y_1- f(t,y_2)|\le C|y_1- y_2 but that is implied by f being differentiable with respect to y so many elementary texts use that stronger condition) then dy/dt= f(t,y), with condition y(t_0)= y_0, has a unique solution in some neighborhood of (t_0, y_0)

That's stated for first order equations but if we let x= y', we can write this equation as
t^2\frac{dx}{dt}- 2tx+ 2y= 0
or
\frac{dx}{dt}= \frac{2}{t}x- \frac{2}{t^2}y
and together with x'= y, we can write that as the first order matrix equation:
\frac{\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y\end{bmatrix}}{dt}= \begin{bmatrix}\frac{2}{t}x- \frac{2}{t^2}y\\ x\end{bmatrix}

Now, the conditios of "continuous" and "Lipgarbagez in y" (or differentiable with respect to y) must apply to both components of the matrix on the right. For linear equations, the requirement that f be "Lipschitz in y" (or "differentiable with respect to y") is automatic but you can see that we have a problem with continuity at t= 0!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K