Units in a heat transferred calculation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the change in temperature using the formula ∆T = q/mc, where confusion arises regarding the units involved. The user is uncertain about the units after rearranging the equation, particularly with kg and kg-1, leading to a misunderstanding of unit cancellation. A clarification is provided that kg multiplied by kg-1 simplifies to kg^0, which equals 1, confirming that the units do indeed cancel out correctly. The user expresses relief upon realizing their mistake and appreciates the assistance. This exchange highlights the importance of understanding unit conversions in heat transfer calculations.
smulc
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to do a calculation using: Heat transferred = mass x specific heat capacity x change in temperature
q=mc∆T

But the value I'm trying to calculate is the change in temperature so I've rearranged the equation to ∆T= q/mc

I think the numbers and answer I have are correct, but the units are confusing me. My answer clearly needs to be in °C, the joules on the top and the bottom will cancel out but then on the bottom I'm left with kg multiplied by kg-1.

3.54 J
450 kg x 4.2 x 103 J kg-1 °C-1

As far as I know, these don't cancel each other out so my answer has the wrong units. I don't know if I've done the entire thing wrong if I'm just confusing myself over something silly. I'd appreciate any help at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smulc said:
... on the bottom I'm left with kg multiplied by kg-1.
So are you wondering what to do with kg·kg-1?

kg is the same as kg+1, so what you really have is kg+1·kg-1. Simplify that using algebra rules for exponents, and you should be all set.
 
ohh I feel really stupid now. Any number to the zero power is equal to 1. I already knew this but mistakingly thought that the result of calculating kg0 would be 1kg, but the answer is literally just 1, isn't it? So the kg does actually cancel. I feel silly for not realising, thanks very much for the help!
 
You're welcome, glad it worked out for you.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K