Universal gravitation 4-determine the weight of astronaut on planet Z

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the weight of an astronaut on Planet Z, which has a mass 50 times that of Earth and a radius 10 times greater. The astronaut's weight on Earth is 833N, and using Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation, the gravitational acceleration on Planet Z is calculated to be approximately 489.95 N/kg. The correct weight on Planet Z is determined by multiplying this gravitational acceleration by the astronaut's mass, which is derived from their weight on Earth. The final weight on Planet Z is approximately 41646.12N, contingent upon accurate calculations of gravitational acceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation
  • Familiarity with gravitational acceleration calculations
  • Knowledge of mass and weight distinctions in physics
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation and its applications
  • Learn how to calculate gravitational acceleration on different celestial bodies
  • Study the relationship between mass and weight in various gravitational fields
  • Explore the implications of changing mass and radius on gravitational forces
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in gravitational calculations and the principles of universal gravitation.

dani123
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An astronaut weighs 833N on the surface of the Earth. Determine the weight of the astronaut on Planet Z if the planet's mass is 50.0 times the mass of the Earth and has a radius of 10.0 times the radius of the Earth.

Homework Equations




Kepler's 3rd law: (Ta/Tb)2=(Ra/Rb)3

motion of planets must conform to circular motion equation: Fc=4∏2mR/T2

From Kepler's 3rd law: R3/T2=K or T2=R3/K

Gravitational force of attraction between the sun and its orbiting planets: F=(4∏2Ks)*m/R2=Gmsm/R2

Gravitational force of attraction between the Earth and its orbiting satelittes: F=(4∏2Ke)m/R2=Gmem/R2

Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation: F=Gm1m2/d2

value of universal gravitation constant is: G=6.67x10-11N*m2/kg2

weight of object on or near Earth: weight=Fg=mog, where g=9.8 N/kg
Fg=Gmome/Re2

g=Gme/(Re)2

determine the mass of the Earth: me=g(Re)2/G

speed of satellite as it orbits the Earth: v=√GMe/R, where R=Re+h

period of the Earth-orbiting satellite: T=2∏√R3/GMe

Field strength in units N/kg: g=F/m

Determine mass of planet when given orbital period and mean orbital radius: Mp=4∏2Rp3/GTp[Kepler's 3rd law: (Ta/Tb)2=(Ra/Rb)3

motion of planets must conform to circular motion equation: Fc=4∏2mR/T2

From Kepler's 3rd law: R3/T2=K or T2=R3/K

Gravitational force of attraction between the sun and its orbiting planets: F=(4∏2Ks)*m/R2=Gmsm/R2

Gravitational force of attraction between the Earth and its orbiting satelittes: F=(4∏2Ke)m/R2=Gmem/R2

Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation: F=Gm1m2/d2

value of universal gravitation constant is: G=6.67x10-11N*m2/kg2

weight of object on or near Earth: weight=Fg=mog, where g=9.8 N/kg
Fg=Gmome/Re2

g=Gme/(Re)2

determine the mass of the Earth: me=g(Re)2/G

speed of satellite as it orbits the Earth: v=√GMe/R, where R=Re+h

period of the Earth-orbiting satellite: T=2∏√R3/GMe

Field strength in units N/kg: g=F/m

Determine mass of planet SUP]2[/SUP]

The Attempt at a Solution



Fg=weight=833N on surface of the Earth

mp=50 * (5.98*1026 kg)
Rp=10*(6.38*106m)= 6380000 m

I used gp=GMp/(Rp)2=489.95 N/kg

I also used Fg=gxmo and manipulated the equation to solve for mo=1.7 kg

Just wondering if someone would be able to have a look at my attempt and let me know if its wrong and if it is maybe point out where it is that I made my mistake. It would be greatly appreciated! Thanks again so much in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wow, that is one complicated pile of equations! (Most of which are irrelevant.)

All you need is this:
dani123 said:
Fg=Gmome/Re2
To find Fg on the planet, just replace the mass and radius of the Earth with the mass and radius of the planet and compare. (Hint: Almost no calculation is required.)
 
A lot of the relevant equations that you posted are actually totally irrelevant. In fact, Newton's universal law of gravitation is all you need, and a couple of the other equations you have there are just Newton's universal law of gravitation applied to specific situations.

For me, step 1 would be to find the mass of the astronaut. It is certainly not 1.7 kg! Think about that for a second. How can a human being have a mass of only 1.7 kg?

Getting the mass shouldn't be too hard, since you know the weight on Earth, and you know g on Earth.

Then the second step, once you have the mass, would be to multiply it by the gp value that you computed to get the weight on the planet.

EDIT: Er, yeah, or you could do what Doc Al said, which is even smarter.
 
do I multiply the gp with the mass of the astronaut on Earth in order to find out the value of his mass on the planet Z? Just want to make sure I understood that correctly...
 
dani123 said:
do I multiply the gp with the mass of the astronaut on Earth in order to find out the value of his mass on the planet Z?
You can certainly do it that way. The mass is the same everywhere, of course. But you'll have to redo your calculation of gp. You can do that easily by just comparing the calculation to that of ge. (Again, hardly any calculation needed. But more than if you followed my original method.)
 
ok so i tried to do what you said but i just ended up getting mass=84.99kg... which is only 0.1kg off from what the mass is on earth...
 
dani123 said:
ok so i tried to do what you said but i just ended up getting mass=84.99kg... which is only 0.1kg off from what the mass is on earth...
I don't quite understand what you mean. There's only one mass. If you calculate the astronaut's mass on Earth then that is also his mass on the planet. (But that value for mass looks OK.)
 
so why do they even ask what the mass on planet Z is, if they are both the same?
 
The question asked for weight, not mass. Weight and mass are two different things in physics, even though in everyday language they are often used interchangeably. You just need to use the physics definition of mass and weight.
 
  • #10
dani123 said:
so why do they even ask what the mass on planet Z is, if they are both the same?
As BruceW already pointed out, they don't ask for the mass on planet Z. They ask for the weight on planet Z.

The only purpose in finding the mass would be to use it to find the weight via Wp = mgp. Which is OK, but, as I have tried to point out, that's the hard way of doing the problem.
 
  • #11
so is it just g of the planet which I found to be 489.95N/kg, and times that by 85kg (which is the mass of the astronaut)? If I do that I get weight=force due to gravity=41646.12N
 
  • #12
dani123 said:
so is it just g of the planet which I found to be 489.95N/kg, and times that by 85kg (which is the mass of the astronaut)? If I do that I get weight=force due to gravity=41646.12N
As I said earlier, you'll need to redo your calculation of g on the planet as it is incorrect. But once you have the correct value of g, then you can multiply it by the mass to find the weight on the planet. (That's the hard way, but perfectly OK.)
 
  • #13
I don't see how my value for g of the planet is wrong though...
 
  • #14
Just for fun, try the easy way. Answer this: If the mass of the planet is increased by a factor of 50, what would happen to the weight of the astronaut? Would it go up or down? By what factor? (Imagine everything else is held fixed.)

Note that this is equivalent to asking: If the mass of the planet is increased by a factor of 50, what would happen to the value of g at the surface?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
dani123 said:
I don't see how my value for g of the planet is wrong though...
dani123 said:
mp=50 * (5.98*1026 kg)
Rp=10*(6.38*106m)= 6380000 m
Check the number of zeroes in that last calculation.
 
  • #16
OPS! thank you for noticing that!
 
  • #17
so the answer should be weight=416.46N?
 
  • #18
dani123 said:
so the answer should be weight=416.46N?
Sounds about right.

But I encourage you to follow the reasoning and answer the question I posed in my last post (#14).
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K