Unraveling the Mystery of Music Intervals

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical basis and cultural significance of the twelve-tone equal temperament system in music, specifically focusing on the interval of \(\sqrt[12]{2}\). Participants explore historical, theoretical, and practical aspects of music intervals, questioning why the number 12 is prevalent in various musical scales and its implications for harmony and human perception.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the significance of \(\sqrt[12]{2}\) in music intervals and why the number 12 is used across various musical scales.
  • Others discuss the historical context of the diatonic scale, suggesting that ancient cultures like the Sumerians and Babylonians may have utilized similar musical structures.
  • One participant notes that the twelve-tone system allows for good approximations of harmonic ratios, which are pleasing to the human ear.
  • There is a mention of the idea that the twelve-tone system may be a reflection of human nature or a universal concept, raising questions about its applicability to potential alien civilizations.
  • Some participants point out that the twelve-tone system is a compromise that allows for modulation between keys, despite not being mathematically perfect for intervals like the perfect fifth.
  • Discussions also touch on the asymmetry in musical scales, questioning why certain intervals are structured the way they are, such as the specific pattern of whole and half steps in scales.
  • Participants express curiosity about the possibility of other tuning systems, such as 41 and 53 equal temperament, and their historical relevance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the reasons behind the twelve-tone system's prevalence or its implications. Multiple competing views are presented regarding its historical significance, mathematical basis, and cultural relevance.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the division into twelve may not have been necessary for ancient cultures that did not frequently change keys, suggesting that the historical use of diatonic scales could involve different interval structures.

  • #31
Mark44 said:
Not really. Music can convey some emotions, maybe, but I don't see how it could be used to convey much more than that.
Twenty six Alphabets + 10 numbers covers 3 octaves in diatonic scale.
In the movie "Close Encounter of the Third Kind", the alien and human use music to communicate.
Okay it's just a movie, but for diferent species with different vocal cords and trained ears just to hear their own vocal cord, perhaps music is a kind of communication tool.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
Stephanus said:
Continuing your list Dr. Greg
5:3 (perfect sixth, La)
9:5 (perfect sixth, Si)
But 5:3 or 9:5 the divider and modifier distance is not 1, 5:3 is 2, whereas 9:5 is 4
I don't know if this is a good cause for 12 interval

You really should read the article that Greg pointed you to.

There is no perfect sixth. There is a major sixth, and a minor sixth.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus
  • #33
Vanadium 50 said:
You really should read the article that Greg pointed you to.

There is no perfect sixth. There is a major sixth, and a minor sixth.
Ahh, you're right Vanadium.
 
  • #34
I think one issues in this thread is that 12-tone and equal-temperament (2^(1/12)) are not the same thing.

Before equal temperament, Pythagoras used perfect fifths to construct the 12 tone scale. As arty pointed out, thus made it difficult to modulate keys, because the errors in Pythagoras' method got larger as you got "further away" (distance measured on circle of fifths, probably) from the key in which the perfect fifths were constructed.

So there were lots of 12 tone scales, and methods of interval cobstruction and 2^(1/12) is really quite a recent one. It's advantage is that it's consistent - all the intervals are exactly the same from the first degree to the second regardless of key.

I think 12 tones (and 24) work so well because of the numerous factors you mentioned (2,3,4,6). I know there are other divisions - the most important thing is the octave (2:1), as it's relevant to how our brain processes audio signals audio signals. After that, the fifth (3:2) is the next most important, then it probably gets rather subjective, emergent, and cultural after that (Even the fifth isn't universally used like the octave is).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus
  • #35
Pythagorean said:
I think 12 tones (and 24) work so well because of the numerous factors you mentioned (2,3,4,6)

Thanks Pythagorean for your answer.
But, the more I think of it, the more I disagree with my previous statement. It's not that 12 can be divided by 2,3,4 or six.
It's that, as DrGreg before pointed out,
DrGreg said:
...2:1 (octave), 3:2 (perfect fifth), 4:3 (perfect fourth), 5:4 (major third), 6:5 (minor third). These ratios sound good to the human ear because the notes share some of the same harmonics.

Minor third: 2(1/12) x 3 ≈ 6:5
Major third: 2(1/12) x 4 ≈ 5:4
Perfect fourth: 2(1/12) x 5 ≈ 4:3
Perfect fifth: 2(1/12) x 7 ≈ 3:2
Octave: 2(1/12) x 12 is of course 2:1
Don't you think so Pythagorean?

I guess this is the answer of my curiosity for years. So simple :smile:
Okay..., one more question for anybody.
π, e, golden ratio, they are all, I think, universally accepted. I mean really universally. Any civilization even outside the Earth will use those constants. What about \sqrt[12]{2}, is it universally used?

Any idea?
 
  • #36
Stephanus said:
Thanks Pythagorean for your answer.
But, the more I think of it, the more I disagree with my previous statement. It's not that 12 can be divided by 2,3,4 or six.
It's that, as DrGreg before pointed out,Minor third: 2(1/12) x 3 ≈ 6:5
Major third: 2(1/12) x 4 ≈ 5:4
Perfect fourth: 2(1/12) x 5 ≈ 4:3
Perfect fifth: 2(1/12) x 7 ≈ 3:2
Octave: 2(1/12) x 12 is of course 2:1
Don't you think so Pythagorean?

I guess this is the answer of my curiosity for years. So simple :smile:
Okay..., one more question for anybody.
π, e, golden ratio, they are all, I think, universally accepted. I mean really universally. Any civilization even outside the Earth will use those constants. What about \sqrt[12]{2}, is it universally used?

Any idea?
My point was that these are two distinct issues. One is the issue of how many notes you subdivide the octave by, the other is how you distribute that subdivision. There's not one way to do it, the only reason that Dr Greg can talk about approximating these ratios in the first place is because these are the ratios that are already desired, and these ratios come from higher order subdivisions (dividing the string in half, thirds, and fourths).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 202 ·
7
Replies
202
Views
14K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
12K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K