MHB Unraveling the P vs NP Problem in Computer Science

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the P vs NP problem in computer science, a fundamental question regarding the relationship between problems that can be solved quickly (P) and those for which solutions can be verified quickly (NP). Participants express a belief that P does not equal NP (P ≠ NP) but acknowledge the difficulty in proving this assertion. One contributor suggests that traditional mathematics may not suffice to solve the problem, proposing that boolean algebra and logic could be key. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem, noting that while some examples of P problems, like matrix inversion, exist, NP problems, such as solving a minesweeper puzzle, lack polynomial-time solutions. The challenge remains that no one has yet proven the absence of a polynomial algorithm for NP problems, which is the crux of the P vs NP millennium problem, offering a reward of $1 million for a solution.
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Didn't know what forum to post this in..There are some brilliant people on this forum, just wanted to know your thoughts on the P vs NP problem in Computer Science? Do you think it will ever be solved? I think P != NP. That being said, I do believe it could be solved but not with normal mathematics. I believe that boolean algebra may be able to solve the problem through LOGIC. As far as statistical formulas creating a Computer AI, I just don't think it's possible. After all, we aren't machines.
 
Technology news on Phys.org
Of course $\text{P} \neq \text{NP}$ , but I believe this is more or less undecidable.
 
It seems like it is pretty obvious that P != NP, but how come no one can prove it? Can you give me a example? Like what are the problems people are running into? Or is it too advanced for me to even comprehend? I'm in Calculus II.
 
Most problems are more or less undecidable whether in P or NP, so I can't really give you some nontrivial ones. What background have you got in computer science?
 
shamieh said:
It seems like it is pretty obvious that P != NP, but how come no one can prove it? Can you give me a example? Like what are the problems people are running into? Or is it too advanced for me to even comprehend? I'm in Calculus II.

One example of a P problem is the inversion of a matrix.

One example of an NP problem is to solve a minesweeper puzzle.

P problems are those which have an algorithm to solve them which takes a number of steps that is a polynomial on the input. In the matrix case, the input are the numbers in the matrix.

NP problems are those which don't have an algorithm to solve them which takes a number of steps that is a polynomial on the input. But this special class of problems also has the property that if you could find a polynomial algorithm to solve one of them, you would solve all of them in polynomial time.

The thing is that you haven't still proved that there is no polynomial algorithm to solve an NP problem. That's the P vs NP millenium problem, which is worth $ 1 000 000.
 
Dear Peeps I have posted a few questions about programing on this sectio of the PF forum. I want to ask you veterans how you folks learn program in assembly and about computer architecture for the x86 family. In addition to finish learning C, I am also reading the book From bits to Gates to C and Beyond. In the book, it uses the mini LC3 assembly language. I also have books on assembly programming and computer architecture. The few famous ones i have are Computer Organization and...
I have a quick questions. I am going through a book on C programming on my own. Afterwards, I plan to go through something call data structures and algorithms on my own also in C. I also need to learn C++, Matlab and for personal interest Haskell. For the two topic of data structures and algorithms, I understand there are standard ones across all programming languages. After learning it through C, what would be the biggest issue when trying to implement the same data...

Similar threads

Back
Top