bigev234
- 4
- 0
The title is the question. Cheers.
The discussion focuses on uranium fuels that are denser than uranium dioxide (UO2), specifically mentioning metal forms such as uranium (U), uranium nitride (UN), uranium carbide (UC), and uranium silicide (U3Si). While these alternatives offer higher density, they are generally more expensive to produce due to conversion processes from uranium hexafluoride (UF6). Key considerations for these fuels include thermal conductivity, melting point, thermal expansion, and fission product retention, particularly in fast reactor applications. The challenges of swelling and fission product migration at high exposure levels are also highlighted, emphasizing the need for careful material selection and processing.
PREREQUISITESNuclear engineers, researchers in nuclear fuel technology, and professionals involved in reactor design and safety will benefit from this discussion.
Fissile/fissionable nuclides are necessary for 'fission' reactors. There are liquid fueled systems, but one still has to address fission product accumulation - it is inherent/inevitable in the process. The presence of alkali metals or indium does not change that.alysdexia said:fast reactor? Is there a free reactor?
If there are warm or mild molten/liquid uranium alloys (with alkali metals or indium maybe) then maybe there wouldn't be a problem of fissile buildup.
Not if the uranium fuel is liquid. Fission products are gaseous (Xe, Kr), volatile (Cs, I, Br), or otherwise metal with various melting points.alysdexia said:But would they be lodged in the fuels?