Use separation of variables to find particular solutions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the partial differential equation (PDE) \(u_t - u_{xx} - 2u_x = 0\) using the method of separation of variables. Participants emphasize the importance of assuming a solution of the form \(u(x,t) = X(x)T(t)\) and demonstrate how to separate the variables correctly. The resulting ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are derived as \(T' = \alpha T\) and \(X'' - 2X' = \alpha X\), where \(\alpha\) is a constant. This method allows for the independent solutions of the functions of \(x\) and \(t\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with the method of separation of variables
  • Knowledge of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Basic calculus, including integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in more detail
  • Learn how to solve ordinary differential equations (ODEs) derived from PDEs
  • Explore boundary value problems related to partial differential equations
  • Investigate the implications of changing coordinates in PDE solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers who are working with partial differential equations and seeking to understand the separation of variables technique for finding particular solutions.

Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
"Use separation of variables to find particular solutions of

[tex]u_t-u_{xx}-2u_x=0, 1<x<2, 0<t, u(1,t)=u(2,t)=0[/tex]

hint: change coordinates"

I can't find the solution. The equation seems already separated, so all I need to do is to find a change of variables, I think. But I can't find one that works.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're looking at it the wrong way.
It's not a change of variables that's wanted, but separation of variables.

Remember this ?

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{y}{x}[/tex]

separate the variables

[tex]\frac{dy}{y} = \frac{dx}{x}[/tex]

now integrate
[tex]\int\frac{dy}{y} = \int\frac{dx}{x}[/tex]
[tex]ln(y) = ln(x) + c[/tex]

You are expected to do something similar.

First of all, you assume a solution of the form u(x,t) = f(x)g(t)
Now substitute that into your original pde and apply separation of variables.
You should end up with functions of x on one side of the equals sign and functions of t on the other side.
Since the lhs is a function of x and the rhs is a function of t, then the only way they (the two functions) can be equal to each other is to set them both equal to the same constant value. i.e. lhs = C and rhs = C
You now have two independent pdes, (in fact, now they are ode's) one in x and one in t, that you can solve separately.
 
Last edited:
Dragonfall said:
"Use separation of variables to find particular solutions of

[tex]u_t-u_{xx}-2u_x=0, 1<x<2, 0<t, u(1,t)=u(2,t)=0[/tex]

hint: change coordinates"

I can't find the solution. The equation seems already separated, so all I need to do is to find a change of variables, I think. But I can't find one that works.
Then you need to review what "separation of variables" means for partial differential equations.

Write u(x,t)= X(x)T(t). That is, X is a function of x only, T a function of t only. The the differential equation becomes
XT'- TX"- 2TX'= 0. Divide both sides by XT to get
[tex]\frac{T'}{T}- \frac{X"}{X}- \frac{2X'}{X}= 0[/tex]
or
[tex]\frac{T'}{T}= \frac{X"- 2X'}{X}[/tex]
Since the left side depends on t only and the right side depends on x only the only way they can be equal (for all x and t) is if each side is a constant:
[tex]\frac{T'}{T}= \alpha[/tex]
so that [itex]T'= \alpha T[/itex]
and
[tex]\frac{X"- 2X'}= \alpha[/tex]
so that [itex]X"- 2X'= \alpha X[/itex]
where [itex]\alpha[/itex] is some unknown constant. The general solution will typically be a sum of such things.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K