Use Surface-Volume to approximate gravity for planets and protons

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an approximation for calculating surface gravity using the gravitational constant, mass, and surface area of celestial bodies. It explores the relationships between these quantities and their implications for both spherical and non-spherical objects, as well as the potential for reverse approximations of the gravitational constant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant derived an approximation for surface gravity as g ≈ (4π G M) / A, suggesting it aligns well with known values for spherical bodies.
  • Another participant noted that the derived formula is mathematically identical to the standard formula for surface gravity, g = GM/r², by substituting the surface area formula A = 4πr².
  • Some participants expressed appreciation for the clarity of the mathematical connections and the alternative perspectives on the derivation.
  • Concerns were raised about the applicability of the formula to non-spherical bodies and the nature of real-world objects not being point masses.
  • There was a mention of the reverse approximation of G and whether it holds meaningful significance or is merely coincidental.
  • Several participants discussed the limitations of modern language models in physics, emphasizing the importance of rigorous sources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical validity of the derived formula and its connection to established physics principles. However, there is no consensus on the applicability of the approximation to non-spherical bodies or the significance of the reverse approximation of G.

Contextual Notes

Some participants noted that real bodies are not perfectly spherical and that the formula is an approximation. There are also discussions about the limitations of using modern language models for physics-related inquiries.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for those interested in gravitational physics, mathematical modeling of physical phenomena, and the exploration of approximations in scientific calculations.

Owe Kristiansen
Messages
27
Reaction score
13
New user reminded that LLMs and AI chatbots are not allowed as references in the technical forums
TL;DR
Approximate surface gravity using the gravitational constant surface area and mass only

g ≈ (4π G M) / A
Title: Gravity Proportional to Mass over Surface Area — A Dimensional Approximation

I derived an approximation for surface gravity using the gravitational constant and surface area:
g ≈ (4π G M) / A

🔍 What Each Symbol Means:

• g: Surface gravity — the acceleration due to gravity at the surface (in m/s²)
• G: Gravitational constant ≈ 6.674 × 10⁻¹¹ m³/kg·s²
• M: Mass of the object (in kilograms)
• A: Surface area of the object (in square meters)
• 4π: A geometric factor that comes from the surface area of a sphere


It matches known values well for spheres.

Main Idea

Starting from the units of the gravitational constant:
[G] = m³ / (kg·s²)

I looked for a combination of measurable quantities:

• g: surface gravity (m/s²)
• A: surface area (m²)
• M: mass (kg)

The combination (g × A) / M gives:
(m/s² × m²) / kg = m³ / (kg·s²)

To match the geometry of a sphere, I introduced the factor 4π, as my calculations was 4pi off, leading to:
G ≈ (g × A) / (4π M)
→ g ≈ (4π G M) / A

This can also be written using:

• α = A / V: specific surface area (1/m)
• v = V / M: specific volume (m³/kg)


Then:
G ≈ (g × α × v) / (4π)

Validation Table (Using Surface Area)

Body | Mass (kg) | Surface Area (m²) | g (calc) | g (known)
---------|----------------|--------------------|----------|----------
Earth | 5.972e24 | 5.10e14 | 9.80 | 9.81
Moon | 7.35e22 | 3.79e13 | 1.62 | 1.62
Sun | 1.989e30 | 6.09e18 | 274 | 274
Jupiter | 1.898e27 | 6.15e16 | 25.9 | 24.8
Proton | 1.6726e-27 | 8.88e-30 | 1.58e-7 | —

---

Reverse Approximation of G

Using:
G ≈ (g × A) / (4π M)

Body | g (m/s²) | Surface Area (m²) | Mass (kg) | G (approx)
---------|----------|--------------------|----------------|-------------
Earth | 9.81 | 5.10e14 | 5.972e24 | 6.67e-11
Moon | 1.62 | 3.79e13 | 7.35e22 | 6.67e-11
Sun | 274 | 6.09e18 | 1.989e30 | 6.67e-11
Jupiter | 24.8 | 6.15e16 | 1.898e27 | 6.68e-11
Proton | 1.58e-7 | 8.88e-30 | 1.6726e-27 | 6.66e-11

---

Feedback Welcome

• Is this formulation already known or used?
• Could the specific volume form be useful for non-spherical bodies?
• Is the reverse approximation of G meaningful or just numerically coincidental?

Note: This article was created with the help of Microsoft Copilot. Some values may contain approximations or errors. Feedback and corrections are welcome.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: leoherry
Physics news on Phys.org
Your formula: g ≈ (4π G M) / A
Surface gravity formula: g = GM/r²
Surface area of sphere formula: A=4πr²

Isolating r² of SA formula: r² = A/4π
Therefore: g = GM/A/4π
Simplifying by multiplying by reciprocal of denominator: g = 4πGM/A

The formulas are identical. :wink:

Edit: Note that real bodies are not spherical and are not point masses, so this formula will always be an approximation for the real world.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Owe Kristiansen
Thanks so much — I really appreciated your comment. I was aware that surface area and radius are connected through A = 4πr², but I hadn’t explicitly walked through how that substitution ties the formula directly back to Newton’s law. The way you laid it out made me feel like I hadn’t missed the mark — just approached it from a different angle. It was reassuring and really well explained. Thanks again for taking the time. 😊
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith
surface area and radius are connected through A = 4πr²
it took me about 2 weeks to figure this out

thank you, and good effort
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Owe Kristiansen
Owe Kristiansen said:
TL;DR Summary: Approximate surface gravity using the gravitational constant surface area and mass only

g ≈ (4π G M) / A

This article was created with the help of Microsoft Copilot
You were lucky this time. Modern LLM’s are not trained to do physics and they hallucinate a lot. They are not considered acceptable sources here at this time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Owe Kristiansen
Dale said:
You were lucky this time. Modern LLM’s are not trained to do physics and they hallucinate a lot. They are not considered acceptable sources here at this time.
Yes, I was, I did not use it for much though.
 
leoherry said:
surface area and radius are connected through A = 4πr²
it took me about 2 weeks to figure this out

thank you, and good effort
Thanks, ratios and units is what make me understand physics more than before.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K