Use vectors and the dot product to prove the midpoint

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on using vectors and the dot product to prove that the midpoint of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equidistant from all three vertices. The key concepts include the dot product formula A⋅B = |A||B|cosΘ and the magnitude of a vector defined as √(x² + y²). The user successfully applied the property that the magnitude of a vector equals the square root of the vector dotted by itself to demonstrate that the distances from the midpoint to each vertex are equal. This approach ultimately resolved the user's initial confusion regarding the application of the dot product.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector operations, specifically dot products
  • Familiarity with vector magnitudes in R²
  • Knowledge of the properties of right triangles
  • Basic grasp of the law of cosines in vector form
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector operations in depth, focusing on dot products and magnitudes
  • Learn how to apply the law of cosines in vector contexts
  • Explore geometric interpretations of vector properties
  • Practice problems involving distances in coordinate geometry
USEFUL FOR

Students studying geometry, particularly those focusing on vectors and their applications in proving geometric properties, as well as educators looking for examples of vector proofs in right triangles.

BoonBoon
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
Use vectors and the dot product to prove that the midpoint of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equidistant to all three vertices.

Homework Equations


[/B]
I know the dot product is A⋅B = |A||B|cosΘ ... or ... A1B1 + A2B2 + A3B3 ... + AnBn

I know the magnitude of a vector is its length, and is given by√(x^2 + y^2) I have omitted the z^2 since I want to solve this in R^2.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I figure doing this in R^2 is easier, so I drew a right triangle with points P(0,0), R(0, y), S(x, 0)

I know the midpoint would be given by T = (x/2, y/2)

I constructed vectors using these points:

PS = <x, 0>
PR = <0, y>
TS = <x/2, -y/2>
RT = <x/2, -y/2>
PT = <x/2, y/2>

From this I can show that the magnitude of TS, RT, and PT are all the same, thus their distances are the same. I can also use this to show that TS = RT. I can then take the dot product of TS and RT and work it down to show the angle between them is 0 (so cosΘ = 1) and thus they are the same vector.

What I cannot do for the life of me is use the dot product to prove that PT has the same magnitude as the other two vectors, TS and RT. I just can't figure it out. I've tried finding ways to express PT as other vectors but everything I've tried has failed. I am tearing my hair out!

Here is a diagram of how I am trying to layout my triangle:

5FKRlNH.png


I would greatly appreciate any insight into this very troubling problem. :(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what the exercise considers "using the dot product". Computing the magnitude of a vector can be regarded as using the dot product. |A| = \sqrt{ A \cdot A}.

There is a vector version of the law of cosines:

If C = A + B then |C|^2 = |A|^2 + |B|^2 + 2( A \cdot B).

If you set C = A - B then it looks like the law of cosines from trigonometry. |C|^2 = |A|^2 + |B|^2 - 2( A \cdot B).

Whether it is acceptable to use the law of cosines for vectors depends on what's been covered in your course.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
I don't know what the exercise considers "using the dot product". Computing the magnitude of a vector can be regarded as using the dot product. |A| = \sqrt{ A \cdot A}.

There is a vector version of the law of cosines:

If C = A + B then |C|^2 = |A|^2 + |B|^2 + 2( A \cdot B).

If you set C = A - B then it looks like the law of cosines from trigonometry. |C|^2 = |A|^2 + |B|^2 - 2( A \cdot B).

Whether it is acceptable to use the law of cosines for vectors depends on what's been covered in your course.

Hey, thank you for your reply. I went about it a little differently than I originally posted and was able to prove it. Thanks for mentioning that a vector's magnitude is equal to the square root of that vector dotted by itself. Using that idea, I was able to prove that the distance to every vertex was the same. I completely forgot about that property, and it turns out it's quite useful, haha. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K