Using a tuning fork vs computer tuner for violin

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sussertown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accuracy Violin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the accuracy of tuning forks versus electronic tuners for violin tuning. The standard pitch reference is A4 at 440.00 Hz, established in 1936, while some tuning forks may be incorrectly labeled, such as C-512 Hz, which is not suitable for standard tuning. Electronic tuners are noted to be significantly more precise than metal tuning forks, which can lead to discrepancies in tuning accuracy. For verification, users are encouraged to consult a laboratory with electronic instruments calibrated to NIST standards.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of concert pitch standards, specifically A4 = 440.00 Hz
  • Familiarity with electronic tuners and their precision
  • Knowledge of tuning fork specifications and historical context
  • Basic principles of sound frequency and musical tuning
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between A4 = 440.00 Hz and alternative pitch standards
  • Explore the calibration process of electronic tuners
  • Learn about the historical evolution of tuning forks and their specifications
  • Investigate how to measure sound frequencies using NIST-calibrated equipment
USEFUL FOR

Musicians, music educators, sound engineers, and anyone interested in the accuracy of musical tuning methods.

sussertown
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Tuning fork vs computer tuner
I use a fork to tune my violin. The school teacher uses an ekectronic tuner which is low. I tried an app tuner on my phone. It is also low. How do I confirm for the teacher that these electronic tuners are not correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
sussertown said:
I use a fork to tune my violin.
sussertown said:
How do I confirm for the teacher that these electronic tuners are not correct?
How do you know that your fork is correct ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu and Vanadium 50
As they say, "If everybody else is out of tune, it might not be everybody else."
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913, sophiecentaur, symbolipoint and 2 others
How old is your tuning fork, and how is it labelled?
It should probably be marked A4, 440.00 Hz, which is the American Standard pitch, adopted in 1936. Before that, the reference was international pitch, where A4 = 435.00 Hz.

Electronic tuners are usually ten times more precise than a metal tuning fork.
 
  • Informative
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, russ_watters and berkeman
He hasn't been here since he posted. Presumably now his violin is tuned so he will never have to tune it again. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds and russ_watters
Vanadium 50 said:
He hasn't been here since he posted.
The OP is irrelevant. Google will watch, then others will follow.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy
Baluncore said:
How do you know that your fork is correct ?
"What!? I've been using my favourite tuning fork for years! It's always kept perfect pitch for me!"

the tuning fork:
1716673265096.png
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: phinds and berkeman
DaveC426913 said:
"What!? I've been using my favourite tuning fork for years! It's always kept perfect pitch for me!"
No you haven't.
A-440 Hz is the International musical pitch reference. The fork shown is clearly a C-512 Hz remnant, from the failed scientific metrication of music, back in the 1960s and 70s.

Wikipedia says: "An alternative pitch standard known as philosophical or scientific pitch fixes middle C at 256 Hz (that is, 28 Hz), which places the A above it at approximately 430.54 Hz in equal temperament tuning. The appeal of this system is its mathematical idealism (the frequencies of all the Cs being powers of two)"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concert_pitch#19th-_and_20th-century_standards

C-512 is cheap, it is an exact integer frequency, one octave above the defined scientific; Middle C-256. There were many forks made in the 1970s, that never sold, but were picked up cheap by "sound therapists". Those forks are now only used as a test pitch, or an alternative medical therapy, since they have a strong placebo harmonic, with excellent internet publicity.

I believe your picture was photoshopped from the same source as this advertisement: https://www.amazon.com/Prestige-Hearing-Frequency-Tuning-Fork/dp/B00062N4P0?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913
  • #10
Baluncore said:
I believe your picture was photoshopped from the same source as this advertisement
Took me a good 20 minutes, too!
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, phinds and Baluncore
  • #12
Ahh.. a question about laboratory standards, or good music? IDK.
If the OP resurfaces, he can take his violin to any good EE lab and have it measured with electronic instruments with calibration to NIST standards. If he cares to go to the right lab the precision could be extreme.
But, they can't tell him if it sounds good or not.
 
  • #13
DaveE said:
Ahh.. a question about laboratory standards, or good music? IDK.
If the OP resurfaces, he can take his violin to any good EE lab and have it measured with electronic instruments with calibration to NIST standards
But he already told us ... they're all loooow! :wink:

DaveE said:
. If he cares to go to the right lab the precision could be extreme.
Sounds like the old adage:
Q: How long does it take to perfectly tune one piano key?
A: Forever.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K